Sunday, March 24, 2024
Speaking of Which
I was struck by
this meme: "If Israelis stop fighting there will be peace. If
Palestinians stop fighting there will be no more Palestinians."
The first line is certainly true. This latest war has been so
devastating that it's hard to imagine any fight left -- at least
of the sort that would strike out at Israelis beyond their wall.
The other obvious point is that there's no risk in trying. If
Hamas does attack again, Israel can always strike back, and that
reaction will be better understood than the systematic, genocidal
war Israel is waging.
The second is less obvious, depending on what you mean by
"stop fighting." Hamas has never had the capability of fighting
Israel like Israel fights Gaza. Hamas has no air force, no navy,
no submarines, no tanks, no heavy artillery, no anti-aircraft or
anti-missile defenses, no drones. Their rockets are small and
unguided, and have never produced more than accidental damage.
Aside from the Oct. 7 jailbreak, the only way an Israeli gets
hurt is by entering Gaza, and even then the ratio of Palestinian-to-Israeli
casualties is 50-to-1 or more. That's not much of a fight.
However, the second line could be rewritten in terms that both
sides will agree with, if not agree on: "Palestinians will [only]
stop fighting when there are no more Palestinians." An army may
sensibly surrender to a more imposing power, but this will only
happen if one has hope of surviving and eventually recovering
from surrender. Germany and Japan surrendered to the US to end
WWII, but only because they believed that they would be given
a chance to return to running their own lives. (See John Dower's
Embracing Defeat for more on how Japan dealt with this.
Japan is a better example than Germany, because its government
was still intact when it surrendered, whereas Germany's was in
tatters after Hitler's suicide.) A number of American Indian
tribes surrendered with similar hopes, even though the US had
given them little reason for such hope.
But Israel's current demands for ceasefire terms, following
the genocidal threats of Israel's leaders, and the genocidal
methodology they've practiced in this war, offer little or no
hope to any Palestinian that surrender is anything but suicide.
Israelis demand absolute servility, but know that they'll never
get everyone to submit, that there will always be resistance of
some sort, and as such their security will always be at risk. This
presents them with an existential dilemma, to which there are only
three solutions: equal rights, separation, or annihilation.
They have long refused to consider equal rights. (Lots of
reasons we needn't consider here, like racism and demography.)
They've considered separation, at least within certain bounds,
but it's naturally a formula for war, so they've insisted on
being the dominant power, both by building up a huge military
advantage and by preventing Palestinians from ever developing
their own popular leadership. But the solution they've always
craved was annihilation. The problem there has been finding a
time when they could get away with it. Oct. 7 was the excuse
they were waiting for, dramatic enough that few of their allies
grasped immediately how they had goaded Hamas into action.
Even so, Israel has always had a numbers problem. America
was able to reduce its native population to levels where they
became politically and economically irrelevant, after which
annihilation no longer mattered, and some reconciliation was
possible. But for Israel, there were always too many Palestinians,
too close by, too economically developed and culturally sophisticated.
For just
these reasons, colonizers eventually gave up on Algeria and South
Africa, but only after extraordinary brutality. Israel is the last
to believe they're strong enough to beat down any and all resistance.
And that's really because they have few if any scruples against
killing every last Palestinian.
And don't for a moment think that Palestinians don't understand
this. They've lived through it for decades, and while often beaten
down, often severely, they've survived to resist again. They'll
survive this, too, and will continue to resist, as peacefully as
Israel will allow, or as violently as they can muster.
Looking further down my twitter feed:
From
Rami Jarrah: Picture of an adult Palestinian male seated on
a couch, surrounded 14 children (a couple into their teens). Text:
"Nobody in this photo is alive. Israel's right to self defence."
From
Kayla Bennett: Chart image. Text: "One of the most horrifying
graphics ever." I looked for an article including the chart, and
came up with:
From
Ryan Heuser: A link to the website for
The New York War Crimes,
reporting on propaganda published by The New York Times
(motto: "All the Consent That's Fit to Manufacture"). I haven't
figured out yet where the illustrations come from.
From
Yousef Munayer retweeted Heuser, adding: "A new poll found that
even though some 30,000 more Palestinians have been killed than
Israelis since October, half of Americans didn't know which side
has lost more lives. This has a lot to do with it."
From
Etan Nechin retweeted Chris Olley: "[Pennsylvania]'s
richest person Jeff Yass is buying Truth Social for $3 Billion so
Trump can pay off his $450 Million judgment in return for Trump
doing a 180 on his Tiktok and China stance to preserve Yass's $30
Billion-with-a-B stake in Tiktok. We call this oligarchy' when it's
elsewhere." Nechin adds: "Notably, Jeff Yass was the main financier
of Kohelet Forum, the shadowy organization behind Israel's attempted
judicial coup that was championed by the settler far right. These
oligarchs care little for democracy, only market interests." The
Wikipedia page for Yass is
here, which
documents all this and more.
From
Daniel Denvir: "Truth Social has roughly twice the monthly app
users as my niche left-wing intellectual podcast has monthly downloads.
The Dig's own healthy but rather modest financial situation suggests
to me that this company is not worth nearly $6 billion."
From
Paul Krugman: "So, did the ACA bend the cost curve? Call it
coincidence, but excess cost growth -- health spending growing
faster than GDP -- basically ended when it passed." See chart:
I'm reminded that Switzerland long had the world's second most
expensive health care system, with costs increasing in tandem with
US costs, until they adopted a universal non-profit insurance scheme.
While this was still much more expensive than systems in UK, Germany,
and France, it halted the increase, while US costs continue to rise.
ACA hasn't worked as well as Switzerland's system -- by design, it isn't
universal, and still allows (and sometimes encourages) profit-seeking --
but it was a step in the right direction.
Initial count: 227 links, 9,825 words.
Not really finished when posted late Sunday night, so some Monday
updates have been added. While sections are marked (like this),
minor edits (like the last paragraph above) are not. (Seems like
there should be a finer-grained way to do this, but I haven't
figured one out yet.
Updated count [03-25]: 259 links, 11,559 words.
Several breaking stories on Monday [03-25] are not reported or
reacted to below, but should be significant next week: Here's the
"heads up":
Luisa Loveluck/Karen DeYoung/Missy Ryan/Michael Birnbaum:
[03-25]
Netanyahu cancels delegation after US does not block UN cease-fire
call: The US, for the first time
since Israel attacked Gaza after the Oct. 7 attacks, abstained from
and didn't veto a cease-fire resolution, allowing it to pass 14-0.
This is the first concrete step that the Biden administration is
developing a conscience over Israel's genocide. A stronger signal
would have been to vote for the resolution. Stronger still would
be to withhold aid (especially munitions) until the cease-fire has
been implemented (at which point Israel won't need the arms). So
Biden still has a long ways to go, but at least he has found a new
direction. Next step will be to show Netanyahu that his tantrum is
for naught, and that his conceit that he actually runs Washington --
which, by the way, is a big part of his political capital in Israel --
is no longer true.
PS: Yousef Munayyer tweeted after this: "The US abstention at
the UNSC today as well as Netanyahu's reaction to it should be
seen as each leader's attempt to manage domestic audiences. What
matters is Biden signed off on $4billion more in weapons for
Israel to further the genocide. Keep your eye on the ball."
Mark Berman/Jonathan O'Connell/Shayna Jacobs: [03-25]
Trump wins partial stay of fraud judgment, allowed to post $175
million: This postpones foreclosure on Trump properties, for
ten days at least (the time allowed to post the bond).
Shayna Jacobs/Devlin Barrett: [03-25]
NY judge sets firm April 15 trial date in Trump's historic hush
money case.
Top story threads:
Israel:
Mondoweiss:
[03-18]
Day 164: Israeli army storms al-Shifa again, aid reaches Jabalia for
first time in months: "Over a million people in Gaza face 'imminent'
famine as UNRWA aid trucks arrive in northern Gaza for the first time
in months. Meanwhile, the Israeli army's Chief of Staff says 'a long
way to go' until Israel's military objectives are achieved."
[03-19]
Day 165: Israeli attacks escalate on Rafah, al-Shifa Hospital invasion
enters second day: "After a night of heavy bombardment the PA warns
Israel's Rafah offensive has begun. Meanwhile, the invasion of al-Shifa
hospital continues; all communication with medical staff trapped inside
the hospital has been silent since Monday evening."
[03-20]
Day 166: Israel kills Gaza officials handling food delivery to the
north; Canada votes to halt arms sales to Israel: "Hamas slams
Israel for 'spreading chaos' after an Israeli airstrike killed two
local police officers in charge of securing and delivering food to
north Gaza. In the West Bank, Israeli forces and settlers kill two
Palestinians."
[03-21]
Day 167: Israel has killed over 100 aid workers in Gaza in the last
week: "Israel has killed over 100 aid workers in Gaza over the
past week as its military siege of al-Shifa Hospital continues.
Meanwhile, the Netanyahu government continues planning for an
invasion of Rafah."
[03-22]
Day 168: US advances UN Security Counsil ceasefire resolution as
al-Shifa Hospital siege enters fifth day: "The siege of al-Shifa
Hospital enters its fifth day as the Israeli army threatens to blow
up the hospital, while the U.S.'s proposed UNSC resolution uses
nebulous language that does not call for an "immediate" ceasefire.
[03-23]
Day 169: Israel kills 7 aid-seekers in northern Gaza, 4 children in
Rafah as siege of al-Shifa Hospital enters sixth day: "Israel
continued its airstrikes on Rafah, killing four children, while in
northern Gaza Israel turned back food aid for the second time in a
week and killed at least 7 Palestinian aid-seekers near the Kuwaiti
roundabout."
[03-24]
Day 170: Israel assaults al-Shifa, Nasser, and al-Amal hospitals
in one day: "Israeli forces ordered Palestinians inside al-Amal
Hospital in Khan Younis to leave 'naked,' while survivors of the
al-Shifa Hospital raid witnessed numerous atrocities committed by
the Israeli army. In Jerusalem, Israeli settlers stormed al-Aqsa."
Sabreen Akhter: [03-21]
When children are present in a genocide.
Faress Arafat: [03-23]
Gaza's children are enduring overwhelming trauma: "A Palestinian
nurse from the al-Shifa Hospital recalls his experience tending to
the children wounded and killed in the war."
Mohamad Bazzi: [03-21]
The Gaza famine is human-made. And the US is complicit in this
catastrophe.
Cate Brown: [03-22]
Israel announces largest West Bank land seizure since 1993 during
Blinken visit.
Eliza Griswold: [03-21]
The children who lost limbs in Gaza: "More than a thousand children
who were injured in the war are now amputees. What do their futures
hold?"
Isaac Chotiner: [03-21]
The brutal conditions facing Palestinian prisoners: "Since the
attacks of October 7th, Israel has held thousands of people from
Gaza and the West Bank in detention camps and prisons." Interview
with Tal Steiner, whose Public Committee Against Torture in Israel
tries to monitor such things.
Stephanie Guilloud: [03-20]
There is nothing we can do about Israel other than everything:
"The war on Gaza is being used to advance fascism and white supremacy
in the U.S. It is also opening people's eyes to global systems that
require genocide to continue. To stand with Palestine is to transform
those systems and build a different world."
Middle East Monitor: [03-13]
Satellite images show 35% of Gaza's buildings destroyed.
Mondoweiss: [03-18]
The real reason Israel stormed al-Shifa Hospital yet again: "Israel's
latest attack on al-Shifa Hospital and the successful delivery of food
aid to northern Gaza are connected. Here's how."
Yumna Patel: [03-22]
Israel's plans to replace its Palestinian labor force could spell
disaster for the Palestinian economy.
Meron Rapoport: [03-20]
The Israeli public is dispirited. So why is the right euphoric?
Jeremy Scahill:
"Man-made hell on Earth": A Canadian doctor on his medical mission
to Gaza: "Palestinian doctors 'are working on a daily basis on
the most horrific, explosive trauma that you've ever seen. They're
doing sometimes 14, 15 amputations, mostly on children, per day,
and they've been doing it for six months now."
Amna Shabana: [03-20]
'All of them are gone except me': "My friend Reem Hamadaqa barely
survived an attack on her home in Khan Younis that killed her parents
and most of her family. What do you tell a friend who has lost nearly
everything?"
Richard Silverstein: [03-23]
Amalek directive approves murders of Hamas leaders' families:
"Israel targeting Hamas leadership for elimination along with all
family members." The "Amalek directive" refers back to an earlier
[2023-10-25] post:
Israeli security cabinet orders murders of senior Hamas leaders and
families: "Ministers tasked IDF and Shin Bet with mass assassinations,
invoking a Biblical verse commanding extermination of Amalek."
Maureen Tkacik: [03-20]
What really happened on October 7? "And why, wonders a new Al
Jazeera documentary, did the media go to such lengths to concoct
gruesome X-rated versions of an attack that was harrowing enough
to begin with?" Pull quote: "Hamas had some rockets, but did it
really have the weaponry capable of mounting this level of
destruction? Western journalists have reported that Hamas was
fully responsible." Who did? Well:
By November, the IDF conceded that it had, actually, deployed
Apache helicopters and tanks to the Nova music festival that "may"
have killed "some" of the Nova festival concertgoers, in accordance
with something called the Hannibal Directive, a doctrine named for
a Carthaginian general who poisoned himself rather than be questioned
by his Roman captors, whereby the Israeli army is ordered to fire
upon its own troops to prevent the enemy from taking those troops
hostage. Around noon on October 7, according to Israeli newspapers
cited in the documentary, the IDF may have invoked a version of the
Hannibal directive, expanded to include Israeli civilians, and in
accordance began blindly opening fire with rockets and helicopter
gunships on any person or vehicle seen moving across the border
with Gaza. In particular, the documentary visits Kibbutz Be'eri,
which looks a bit like present-day Gaza in parts, with a munitions
expert who demonstrates strong evidence that some of the houses had
been hit with IDF tank fire. It was Israeli troops, not Hamas
"murderers," according to one resident, who killed 12 longtime
residents there.
Also on the Al Jazeera documentary:
Alex de Waal: [03-21]
We are about to witness in Gaza the most intense famine since the second
world war: "Even when the numbers of people needlessly dying dwindle,
the scars of famine will endure."
Vivian Yee/Iyad Abuheweila/Abu Bakr Bashir/Ameera Harouda: [03-23]
Gaza's shadow death toll: Bodies buried beneath the rubble.
Israel vs. world opinion:
Michael Arria:
Ramzy Baroud: [03-22]
Cognitive dissonance: Perplexed US foreign policy is prolonging Gaza
genocide: "Perplexed" works on two levels here: they can't figure
out how to do things, because they're stuck in a lot of dysfunctional
ideas (like deterrence, sanctions, their great "indispensable nation"
conceit); but they also can't figure out what they want to do, partly
because Israel doesn't allow them any sensible options.
Daniel Boguslaw:
Biden decries civilian deaths in Gaza as Pentagon fails with its own
safeguards.
Peter Beinart: [03-22]
The great rupture in American Jewish life.
Jonathan Chait: [03-21]
Schumer is a better friend to Israel than Netanyahu's allies:
"Israelis have a right to know the dangers of Netanyahu's
one-statism."
Stan and Priti Gulati Cox: [03-19]
Blocking the aid trucks, letting the tanks roll.
Thomas L Friedman: [03-19]
What Schumer and Biden got right about Netanyahu: Like them,
Friedman's been so securely on the party bus for so long that he
feels entitled to weigh on on Israeli politics, if only to pretend
that something can be redeemed out of their descent into genocide.
Mostly, that means another attempt to rescue the "two-state" mirage.
As I've noted elsewhere, "two-state" is a card that Israel shows on
occasion when it seems convenient, but always withdraws, because
they're unwilling to allow anything like an independent state of
Palestinians. Or maybe they've just found it unnecessary, as long
as no one seriously twists their arms -- Americans have nominally
supported "two-state" since 1967, but never required more than a
bit of lip-service. They have at various points suggested they'd
agree to "two-state": they supported the 1937 and 1947 partition
plans, they agreed to UN resolutions in 1967 and 1973 which they
never followed up on, they agreed with Egypt in 1979 to "autonomy"
(a vague term with no timetable), they agreed to Oslo (with various
delays for "confidence building" that never happened, at least to
their satisfaction); all the while building more settlements
designed to establish "facts on the ground" making it impossible
to return land to any Palestinian state.
Friedman's six points here just show how maleable his mind is
to Israeli thinking. For instance, "Hamas's attack was designed to
halt Israel from becoming more embedded than ever in the Arab world
thanks to the Abraham Accords and the budding normalization process
with Saudi Arabia." So, the real reason a thousand Hamas fighters
undertook a suicide mission was to spoil Jared Kushner's kickback
scam? Gaza had been blockaded and was being choked to near-death,
especially since 2005, but Israelis can only imagine their own
existence at stake.
Mention "one-state," with its obvious implication of everyone
under that state enjoying equal rights, and Israelis will reject
the very idea as a "non-starter" -- as an idea they're unwilling
to even entertain, even though every real democracy takes pains
to protect minority individual rights from majoritarian abuse.
Liz Goodwin/Abigail Hauslohner/Yasmeen
Abutaleb/Leigh Ann Caldwell: [03-20]
Republicans hug Netanyahu tighter as Democratic tensions with Israel
war strategy boil: "The Israeli PM criticized Schumer's comments
calling for a new election as 'outrageous' in GOP-only meeting." The
meeting itself says volumes about those present: how arrogant and
careless Netanyahu is about entering into American party politics,
and how arrogant and careless Republicans are in usurping Biden's
foreign policy prerogatives. But my first reaction was simply,
"birds of a feather flock together" -- be they fascists, or merely
criminal-minded.
Michael Hirsh: [03-22]
From 'I love you' to 'asshole': How Joe gave up on Bibi.
Elie Quinlan Houghtaling:
In harrowing speech, AOC warns the US is aiding "genocide" in Gaza.
Gabriela Kaplan: [03-24]
'Not in my name': How a new generation is divesting from Israeli
apartheid.
Fred Kaplan: [03-18]
What Trump really means when he says he would end the war in Gaza
"quickly". Why write the article when you know the answer is
"nothing"? Trump spent his first term in thrall to his advisers
and donors/investors, and got nothing to show for it (aside from
his son-in-law pocketing $2B for his Abraham Accords scam). Ok,
one stroke of genius was scheduling the Afghanistan withdrawal to
occur on Biden's watch, as that was the exact point his approval
rates sunk under 50%. But that suggests Trump was smart enough
to lose 2020 on purpose, so Biden would get blamed for all of
the messes Trump left -- Afghanistan, Ukraine, and Gaza are the
loudest ones to date, but many more are still simmering -- so he
could rise again and claim a second term on his own far more
extremist terms. The main foreign policy change to expect from
Trump 2.0 is that he will provide a much more credible test of
Nixon's "madman theory."
Tariq Kenney-Shawa: [03-22]
Don't be fooled by Antony Blinken's crocodile tears: "The
secretary of state is very good at projecting empathy about the
horror in Gaza. But his actions speak much louder than his words."
Amed Khan:
Organizing aid to Gaza led me to a harsh truth: Biden is on board
for ethnic cleansing: "I helped with airlifts in Afghanistan,
aid to the Ukrainian front, and building roads in Rwanda. None of
it prepared me for the challenges of Gaza.
David Klion:
Hit dogs holler: What the backlash against Jonathan Glazer says
about Israel's defenders.
Mary Lawlor: [03-21]
There is no moral argument that justifies the sale of weapons to
Israel: "Israel has shown it will use these arms indiscriminately
against Palestinians."
Branko Marcetic: [03-23]
Israel's meddling in US politics is aggressive and unceasing.
Joseph Massad: [03-20]
In the West, Israel never reinitiates violence, it only 'retaliates':
Or so says Western media, especially the New York Times.
Jeff Melnick: [02-27]
A 'Black-Jewish alliance' in the US? Israel-Gaza war shows it's more
myth than special relationship.
James North: [03-23]
Mainstream media finally reports on Gaza famine but won't admit
Israel is deliberately responsible.
Trita Parsi: [03-22]
Why US ceasefire proposal failed at UNSC: "Russia and China
vetoed language which did represent a shift for Biden -- but the
devil is in the details."
Mitchell Plitnick: [03-23]
Chuck Schumer's speech widens rifts over Israel in Congress:
"Democrats are fracturing over support for Israel, because their
constituents don't support it. The long-term result might be the
end of the bipartisan consensus on Israel."
Ted Rall: [03-20]
Israel: Hermit kingdom: "Why is Israel rapidly sliding into
pariah status now?"
Michael Sappir:
The spiraling absurdity of Germany's pro-Israel fanaticism.
Karim Sariahmed: [03-19]
Doctors justify genocide in a prestigious journal: "The Journal
of the American Medical Association published four letters rife with
racist anti-Palestinian tropes. The prestigious platform created the
appearance of intellectualism and expertise, but it's all just racism
with a ribbon on it."
Norman Solomon: [03-24]
How Israel hides its atrocities in Gaza: "Apologists for Israel's
mass murder in Gaza fall back on 'antisemitism' claims."
Prem Thakker:
US doubles down on defunding UNRWA -- despite flimsy allegations.
Philip Weiss: [03-24]
Weekly Briefing: Zionism will never be viewed the same after the
Gaza genocide: "Jeffrey Goldberg used to brag of his Israeli
military service but this week was forced to withdraw from a
speaking event after students asked how a former IDF prison guard
could speak on democracy. Zionism has lost its hallowed perch in
U.S. society."
America's increasingly desperate and pathetic empire:
Sam Biddle:
Tech official pushing TikTok ban could reap windfall from US-China
cold war.
Connor Echols: [03-21]
'Not defendable': Top enlisted brass blast conditions for soldiers:
"The 'quality of life' for military and their families has become a
persistent problem, and its feeding into the recruitment crisis."
Jonathan Freedland: [03-22]
In defying Joe Biden, Benjamin Netanyahu is exposing the limits of US
power.
Daniel Larison: [03-22]
Hawks pushing for 'axis of evil' reunion tour: "Lumping US
adversaries into a single-headed monster is a paranoid delusion
used as to fuel militarism."
Alfred McCoy: [03-12]
The American Empire in (ultimate? crisis: "The decline and fall
of it all?" Sections, predictably, include: "Creeping disaster in
Ukraine"; "Crisis in Gaza"; and "Trouble in the Taiwan Straits."
Andrew O'Hehir: [03-04]
America in 2024: Blind, blundering Colossus on a downward slide:
"If the Biden-Trump rerun wasn't embarrassing enough, US support for
Israel has alienated the entire world."
Ishaan Tharoor: Washington Post's "Worldview" columnist.
These pieces could be scattered about, but fit together:
[03-19]
Israel's war on Hamas brings famine to Gaza: "What makes this
calamity all the more stunning is that it's entirely the product
of human decisions." Catherine Russell says, "we haven't seen that
rate of death among children in almost any other conflict in the
world." He also notes that "Israeli officials, chiefly Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, appear unmoved by the state of
affairs." Like it's exactly what they wanted.
[03-20]
How the war in Ukraine has split the Czechs and Slovaks.
[03-22]
Mexico rejects Texas's 'draconian' migrant law.
[03-25]
The US and Israel have a 'major credibility problem': Let's
quote some of this, about US Assistant Secretary of State Bill
Russo:
According to NPR, Russo said in his March 13 call that Israel --
and the United States, as Israel's security guarantor and close ally --
face a "major credibility problem" because of the war, the astonishing
Palestinian death toll (now more than 32,000 people),
the man-made famine gripping ravaged areas of the Gaza Strip,
and growing global frustration with Israel's insistence on prolonging
the war to fully eradicate militant group Hamas.
"The Israelis seemed oblivious to the fact that they are facing
major, possibly generational damage to their reputation not just in
the region but elsewhere in the world,"
the memo saida. "We are concerned that the Israelis are missing
the forest for the trees and are making a major strategic error in
writing off their reputation damage."
Alex Thurston: [03-21]
Why the Nigerien junta wants to kick US troops out: "While
Washington's policy has been rudderless since last year's coup,
an American exit might not be a bad thing." Also:
Election notes: After Super Tuesday, this is
turning into a category with not much happening, or at least not much
people are bothering to write against. March 19 saw presidential
primaries in Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, and Ohio. Biden's
been winning the Democratic side by a bit over 80%, which isn't
great for an incumbent, but also isn't disastrous. Trump wins as
easily, but rarely hits 80% -- also not great considering no one
is actively running against him. (In Arizona, the figures were
89.3% Biden, 78.8% Trump; in Florida, 81.2% Trump; in Illinois,
91.5% Biden, 80.6% Trump; in Kansas 83.8% Biden, 75.5% Trump;
in Ohio, 87.1% Biden, 79.2% Trump; in Louisiana, 86.1% Biden,
89.8% Trump. Missouri had a caucus, where Trump got 100% of 924
votes.
Paul Krugman: [03-21]
What's the matter with Ohio?
Nia Prater: [03-22]
The Republican Party is too embarrassing for George Santos:
So he's going to run as an independent in Nick LaLota's (R-NY)
House district. Most people run as independents because they
think they are, but the big advantage for Santos is that he can
keep his campaign finance scam going all the way to November,
instead of getting wiped out in the primary. So pretty much the
same reason Bob Menendez is running as an independent to keep
his Senate seat in New Jersey.
Trump, and other Republicans: Salon picks up some substantial
pieces, but they also do a lot of stuff that basically amounts to Trump
trolling. I usually skip past them, but this week they especially spoke
to me, so quite a few got crammed in here this week. I can also give
you some author indexes, in case you want to dig deeper (just scanning
the titles is often a hoot):
This week's links on all things Republican (the Trumpier the
better, but the real evil lies in the billionaire-funded think tanks):
Avram Anderson/Shealeigh Voitl: [03-22]
Heritage Foundation's blueprint for regression: "Project 2025
targets vulnerable communities, politicizes independent institutions,
and quashes dissent."
Gregg Barak: [03-23]
It's time to ignore Trump's trials: Criminal accountability is now
a distraction: "Please wake up sleeping America." It's a rather
messy argument, but until judgment came, the civil trials seemed
like a circus sideshow, but now he's scrambling for money. Barak
himself has a book coming out soon, which news will quickly render
obsolete:
Indicting the 45th President: Boss Trump, the GOP, and What We Can
Do About the Threat to American Democracy.
Jonathan Chait: [03-23]
The paramilitary candidate: "Trump has made justice for
insurrectionists the center of his campaign."
Jeremy Childs: [03-24]
Eric Trump says lenders he hit for half-billion dollars in father's
bond scramble 'were laughing'.
Nick Corasaniti/Maya King/Alexandra Berzon: [03-18]
The GOP flamethrower with a right-wing vision for North Carolina:
"Mark Robinson, the Republican nominee for governor, has a long
history of inflammatory statements. He has also called for weaving
conservative religious beliefs into the fabric of government."
Oliver Darcy: [03-22]
NBC hires former RNC chair Ronna McDaniel, who has demonized the
press and refused to acknowledge Biden was fairly elected. As
Norman Ornstein
tweeted: "At $300,000. Far more than experts, and honest analysts.
What an utter disgrace." Not the only blowback:
Igor Derysh:
Chauncey DeVega:
Kevin T Dugan: [03-21]
How screwed is Trump? "Unless he can find a way out of paying
Tish James, he will go bust on Monday."
Abdallah Fayyad: [03-19]
Trump is suddenly in need of a lot of cash. That's everyone's
problem. Why on earth is that? The US judicial system isn't
famed for treating convicts with the sort of kid gloves Trump
feels he's entitled to. Is this supposed to be some variation
on the joke: "if you owe thousands, that's your problem; if you
owe millions, that's the bank's problem"? Whatever happened to
"if you can't do the time, don't do the crime"? I might grant
that the system, in general, is biased against defendants, and
tends toward overly harsh judgments. But why should Trump, a
guy who seems incapable of remorse, and who has never shown any
sympathy for anyone else, be the exception? If anything, he's
a flagrant example of what the justice system is designed to
protect us against.
Henry A Giroux: [03-17]
Brecht's warning about the serpent's egg: Everyday Fascism:
"In a world shaped increasingly by emerging authoritarianism, it
has become increasingly difficult to remember what a purposeful
and substantive democracy looks like."
Rae Hodge: [01-29]
The Trump White House was hopped up on Air Force "go pills" because
of course it was.
Elie Honig: [03-22]
What are the odds Trump goes on trial before the election?
Brian Karem: [03-21]
We have met the enemy and he is us: "Trump is just a symptom. The
absurdity is everywhere." Links to:
Ed Kilgore:
Clare Malone: [03-25]
The face of Donald Trump's deceptively savvy media strategy:
"The former President and his spokesman, Steven Cheung, like to hurl
insults at their political rivals, but behind the scenes the campaign
has maintained a cozy relationship with much of the mainstream press."
Evidently, he's the one responsible for lines like "[DeSantis] shuffled
his feet and gingerly walked across the debate set like a 10 year old
girl who had just raided her mom's closet and discovered heels for the
first time" and "it's clear to see that Haley's campaign is just one
giant grift to either build her name ID for life after politics or to
audition for a cable news contributor contract."
Amanda Marcotte:
Lisa Mascaro/Mary Clare Jalonick/Jill Colvin:
[03-19]
Trump is making the Jan. 6 attack a cornerstone of his bid for the
White House.
David Masciotra: [03-16]
Ignorance and democracy: Capitalism's long war against higher education:
"My alma mater, and dozens of other colleges, are ditching the liberal
arts. That's a good way to kill off democracy." Sounds like a pretty
broad indictment, but first two words in article are "Donald Trump,"
and a pull quote cites advanced degree holders Ron DeSantis and Ted
Cruz. When I see names of some Harvard grads -- KS Attorney General
Kris Kobach is one, and as far as I can tell he's never written a law
that's been upheld as constitutional -- I'm reminded of the Randy
Newman lyric: "Good old boys from LSU, went in dumb, came out dumb
too."
This led me to a couple older articles:
Andrea Mazzarino: [03-21]
A dictatorship on day one? If America were a Trumpian autocracy.
Kelly McClure: [03-22]
Trump refers to AG Letitia James as having an "ugly mouth" and "low IQ"
in Truth Social rant.
Harold Meyerson: [03-21]
Republicans say it aloud: They want to raise the retirement age:
"The vast majority of House GOPniks tell Americans that if they want
Social Security, they need top work longer."
- Stephanie Mencimer: [03-25]
From laddie mag model to RNC co-chair: Lara Trump, nepo-spouse.
Dean Obeidallah: [03-22]
"He'll never leave": Why Trump's dynasty, built on corruption and violence, won't end with him: Interview with Ruth Ben-Ghiat, author of
Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present.
Heather Digby Parton:
Christian Paz: [03-21]
3 theories for why Donald Trump's popularity is rising: None are
very convincing:
- Trump is benefiting from economic nostalgia
- Trump is recovering from a remarkably low moment
- Trump is benefiting from a quieter campaign, muted coverage, and
a tuned-out public
You might as well say it's because many people are forgetful,
gullible, ill-tempered and flat-out stupid, because that's what
Trump's campaign -- which, by the way, has not been very quiet
or muted, no matter how many have tried to tune it out -- caters
to. I think this also reflects two problems that Biden has: he
represents the status quo, which in the end will probably save
him, but for now it's mostly marked by increasing inequality and
precarity, even through relatively decent economic stats; also,
Biden's still in the phase where he's mostly campaigning for the
donors -- and he's raising more money, even before you deduct the
fines and legal costs Trump is racking up. That focus will shift
with the DNC in August, when they start spending their war chest
on actually wooing voters they've thus far taken for granted.
Sam Russek:
The mattress tycoon funding the far right in Texas: Jim McIngvale.
Greg Sargent:
Trump's latest rage-rant reveals a major political weakness.
- Deirdre Shesgreen: [03-18]
'Gross misjudgment': Experts say Trump's decision to disband pandemic
team hindered coronavirus response.
Matt Stieb:
Kirk Swearingen: [03-24]
Who brought the crime, the drugs and the rape? It was him: "Trump's
infamous 2015 speech claimed immigrants were 'bringing crime' and were
'rapists.' Talk about projection."
Prem Thakker:
House Republicans want to ban universal free school lunches.
Lucian K Truscott IV: [03-19]
Trump blows the MAGA whistle -- and his signal is heard loud and
clear.
Andra Watkins:
[03-19]
Decoding Project 2025's Christian nationalist language:
"Evangelicalese allows Trump's MAGA supporters to hide their extreme
positions in plain sight." Note: She also has a Substack called
How Project 2025 Will Ruin YOUR Life. Previously wrote:
[03-01]
Project 2025 is more than a playbook for Trumpism, it's the Christian
Nationalist manifesto: "The right intends to force every American
to live their definition of a good life through government edict."
Li Zhou: [03-20]
How the threat of a government shutdown became normalized.
Biden and/or the Democrats:
Perry Bacon Jr: [03-19]
Voters of color are shifting right. Are Democrats doomed?
Hannah Story Brown: [03-25]
Tim Ryan's natural gas advocacy makes a mockery of public service:
Ex-Representative (D-OH), ran for Senate and lost, now "leveraging his
prior career for a group backed by fossil fuel and petrochemical players."
Why do you suppose he couldn't convince voters he'd serve them better
than a Republican?
Gail C Christopher: [03-22]
Stop ageism: A call for action: "It's one of the last socially
acceptable forms of prejudice, and it needs to come to an end in
society and this presidential campaign." Really, you think this is
going to work? Or even help? Believe me, I know it happens, often
in cases where it is inappropriate, but unlike many prejudices,
there is also something substantive at root here, and finding the
right combination of respect and care and understanding in each
distinct case is going to take some work, and not just a bumper
sticker slogan.
Ryan Cooper: [03-11]
Democrats need a party publication: "The New York Times is
not going to get Biden's campaign message before voters." Pull
quote: "There is a giant right-wing propaganda apparatus blasting
Republican messaging into tens of millions of homes every day,
which Democrats do not have." Also: "You could do quite a lot of
journalism for a tiny, tiny fraction of what the Democrats are
going to spend on the 2024 campaign." I figured the line about
the New York Times was some kind of joke, but here's the unfunny
part:
A recent speech from New York Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger makes
clear that he -- perhaps unsurprisingly for a scion of multigenerational
inherited wealth -- is proud of his paper's ludicrously anti-Biden slant
and virulent transphobia, and will keep doing it. If it's up to him,
this campaign will center around Biden's age, while Trump's numerous
extreme scandals and outright criminality -- as well as his own advanced
age and dissolving brain -- will be carefully downplayed. If I were Biden
and the Democrats, who implicitly elevate the Times as their counterpoint
to Fox, I'd be looking to change that, and quick.
James Downie: [03-23]
House Republicans just gave Biden the biggest possible gift: "When
it comes to Social Security and Medicare, Republicans just can't help
themselves." I could have filed this under Republicans, but didn't
want this piece to get lost among this week's Trump scuzziness. Trump
is a problem, but he's merely cosmetic compared to the deep Republican
mindset, which remains set on destroying the institutions that at least
minimally protect us from the most predatory practices of capitalism,
supposedly in favor of an entrepreneurial utopia. I was pointed to
this piece by an Astra Taylor tweet (link just vanished), possibly
because the piece itself cites her The Age of Insecurity.
Robert Kuttner:
[03-18]
Man of steel: "President Biden's blockage of the proposed purchase
of US Steel by Japan's Nippon Steel is unprecedented and magnificently
pro-union."
[03-22]
The promise of Biden's second term: "And the exemplary effects of
his green jobs creation programs in his first term."
Legal matters and other crimes:
Climate and environment:
Stephen Lezak: [03-22]
Scientists just gave humanity an overdue reality check. The world
will be better for it. This follows on [03-20]
Geologists make it official: we're not in an 'anthropocene' epoch.
For geologists, it's a fairly technical question, and given the ways
geologists think about time, I'm not surprised that they don't see
need for another division. The Holocene only starts with the retreat
of the Wisconsin Ice Age -- the fifth major glacial advance of the
Pleistocene, itself an arguably premature designation. (The factors
that drove ice ages during the period have are presumably still in
place -- certainly the continents haven't moved much, nor has the
earth orbit changed, or solar output -- but the atmosphere has been
altered enough to make renascent glaciation very unlikely.) Humans
started leaving their mark on the Earth's surface as the
Holocene
started some 11,700 years ago, so the whole epoch could have been
named the Anthropocene. Perhaps that seemed presumptuous when first
named, and maybe even now, but using 1952 as an convenient dividing
line is simply arbitrary.
Delaney Nolan:
The EPA is backing down from environmental justice cases nationwide.
Cassady Rosenblum: [03-23]
Blocking Burning Man and vandalizing Van Gogh: Climate activists are
done playing nice: This is indicative of what happens with those
in power deny, dissemble, and ultimately fail at problems that have
become overwhelmingly obvious. Those in power should see protests --
orderly of course, but also disruptive and destructive -- as symptoms
of underlying issues that require their attention.
But most often,
they think they can get away with suppressing protests, which by
aggravating the protesters while ignoring the problems only makes
future protests more desperate, and dangerous. As noted here,
"something desperate and defiant is stirring in the climate
movement." Signs of escalating tactics are as easily measured
as the increasing ppm of greenhouse gases. The tipping points
of catastrophic inflections are harder to guess, but their odds
are approaching inevitable, as we have observed stressed humans
do many times before, in many comparable situations.
David Wallace-Wells: [03-20]
When we see the climate more clearly, what will we do? There
is not a satellite designed to locate methane leeks.
Business/economic matters:
Ukraine War:
Blaise Malley: [03-22]
Diplomacy Watch: Middle powers offer unique 'congrats' to Putin:
"Leaders in Turkey, India, use post-election phone calls to offer
support in future negotiations."
New York Times: [03-23]
Death toll rises to 133 in Moscow concert hall attack: US
sources were quick to blame this on ISIS, and to deny Ukrainian
involvement (although Zelensky couldn't resist a "told you so").
PS:
Simon Jenkins: [03-22]
Putin is a dictator and a tyrant, but other forces also sustain him --
and the west needs to understand them: "Kneejerk criticism of
regimes in Russia, China or India may make us feel better, but there's
no evidence it is making the world a safer place."
Joshua Keating: [03-22]
Why the Pentagon wants to build thousands of easily replaceable,
AI-enabled drones: "Ukraine's drone innovations have changed
how the US is planning for a war with China."
Jack Hunter: [03-20]
Lindsey Graham wants to force more Ukrainian men into the draft:
"The war-hawking senator said 'we need more people in the line.' But
'we' doesn't mean 'he.'"
Pjotr Sauer: [03-22]
Over 1m Ukrainians without power after major Russian assault on
energy system: "Kyiv says the country's largest dam and hydroelectric
plant were hit as Moscow unleashed 88 missiles and 63 drones." For more,
see their
Ukraine war briefing, which also reminds us of the peril facing
the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant."
Ted Snider: [03-20]
How many Westerners are fighting in Ukraine? "There may be more
foreign boots on the ground -- troops and mercenaries -- than you
think."
Simon Tisdall: [03-16]
How will the Ukraine war end? Only when Vladimir Putin is toppled.
This extremely stupid piece was written while Russia's election was
happening, which we now know gave Putin six more years with 87% of the
vote. He raises the usual alarms about "white flags" and "capitulation,"
castigates Putin as a "messianic mass murderer," and conjures up a new
domino theory, assuming that any sign of weakness would only encourage
Russia to attack and swallow more territories. Still, there's little
reason to believe that Putin could do those things if he wanted to,
which is far from certain. The war is stalemated, but neither side can
afford to give up, nor is likely to (and clearly, Russia is no more
likely to than the US, where Putin's patsy is leading in the polls --
but still 10 months away from becoming president). And despite all
his bluster, even Tisdall admits that a "middle way" -- basically a
Korea-type ceasefire where "near-term priorities need to shift from
attempting to liberate more territory to defending and repairing
the more than 80% of the country still under [Ukraine's] control."
I'd submit that an even better deal would be possible -- maybe not
on territory, but you'd get more security by allowing economic ties
to return to normalcy. One should recall that the parts of Ukraine
that Russia was able to seize, especially in 2014 but also extras
in 2022, were mostly ethnic Russian, and acted as a pro-Russian
bloc inside Ukraine. Giving them up makes the rest of Ukraine more
pro-western, which is what the US/EU wanted in the first place. I'd
call that a win -- and one which Putin wouldn't have to think of as
a loss.
Robert Wright: [03-22]
Special cold war freak-out issue: "China and Russia and Cuba --
oh my!" First section is on TikTok, if you're interested, but I want
to point you to the second, on how the Wall Street Journal (Yaroslav
Trofimov) tries to twist around things that Putin says to suggest
negotiating with him is impossible. Further down there's a section on
the "Havana Syndrome" freak out, plus his concerns over AI -- which
is more the subject of his [03-15]
Meta's dangerously carefree AI chief. I'm rather skeptical of his
alarm over Open Source in AI -- my position has always been that the
real threat is the business model, and Open Source usually tempers
that sort of problem (but doesn't preclude it, as Google has amply
demonstrated). I'm an admirer but unpaid subscriber, so I haven't
listened to his podcasts, but
What does Putin want? could be helpful, especially to the
aforementioned WSJ reporter.
Around the world:
Connor Echols: [03-20]
US 'prepared to deploy troops to Haiti if necessary. If Biden
goes along with this, I dare say it would be political suicide. For
Trump, as for most US presidents going back to Thomas Jefferson,
Haiti is the quintessential "shithole country." Right-thinking
Americans would bristle at the idea of doing anything to help
there. Realistic Americans would realize that the US military is
not capable of helping, and that its entrance would make matters
worse. The left should be pushing back against Biden's warmaking
on all fronts. And nobody wants another costly quagmire.
Sam Knight: [03-25]
What have fourteen years of Conservative rule done to Britain?
"Living standards have fallen. The country is exhausted by constant
drama. But the UK can't move on from the Tories without facing up
tot he damage that has occurred."
Robert Kuttner: [03-13]
WTO, RIP: "The annual World Trade Organization meeting came
to an ignominious end last week with no 'progress' on major issues.
That is a form of progress."
Emily Tamkin:
Slovakia's presidential election is a warning to America:
"What to see what the United States would look like under a reelected
Trump?"
Other stories:
Laura Bult: [03-21]
Why it's so hard for Americans to retire: "There's a reason so
many of us don't have enough retirement savings." Video piece, but
links to Teresa Ghilarducci's book,
Work, Retire, Repeat: The Uncertainty of Retirement in the New Economy.
Probably good, but Astra Taylor covers the key point in her
The Age of Insecurity: Coming Together as Things Fall Apart.
Stephanie Burt:
Lucy Sante and the solitude and solidarity of transitioning:
"In her new memoir, I Heard Her Call My Name, Sante dissects
her past in order to understand her future."
David Dayen: [01-29]
America is not a democracy. Long piece from the print magazine.
Seems like I should have noticed it before. Too much to get into
just now.
Sarah Jones:
The exvangelicals searching for political change. Self-evident
neologism is from the book reviewed herein, The Exvangelicals:
Loving, Living, and Leaving the White Evangelical Church, by
Sarah McCammon. Related here:
Carlene Bauer: [03-12]
She trusted God and science. They both failed her. Review of
Devout: A Memoir of Doubt, by Anna Gazmarian, "an author
who grew up in the evangelical church recounts her struggle to
find spiritual and psychological well-being after a mental health
challenge."
Rich Juzwiak: [03-12]
A biography of a feminist porn pioneer bares all: "In Candida
Royalle and the Sexual Revolution, the historian Jane Kamensky
presents a raw personal -- and cultural -- history." Another review:
Keren Landman: [03-20]
Abortion influences everything: "By inhibiting drug development,
economic growth, and military recruitment, as well as driving doctors
away from the places they're needed most, bans almost certainly harm
you -- yes, you."
Katie Moore: [03-17]
When Kansas police kill people, the public often can't see bodycam
footage. Here's why.
Marcus J Moore: [03-21]
The visions of Alice Coltrane: "In the years after her husband
John's death, the harpist discovered a sound all her own, a jazz
rooted in acts of spirit and will." I'll say something about this
in Music Week. Meanwhile:
Rick Perlstein: [03-20]
'Stay strapped or get clapped': "How the media misses the story
of companies seeking profit by keeping traumatized veterans armed
and enraged."
Andrew Prokop: [03-21]
The political battle over Laken Riley's murder, explained:
Riley was a 22-year-old student in Georgia who was murdered,
allegedly by an "illegal immigrant," an event seized upon by
right-wing agitators, like the guy who tweeted: "If only people
went to the streets to demand change in the name of Laken Riley,
like they did for George Floyd." Article provides more details.
While the murders as isolated events were equivalent, the policy
considerations are very different, starting with responsibility
for enabling the killers, and regarding the more general context.
One not even mentioned here is the effect of the sanctions and
isolation policy toward Venezuela -- mostly but not exclusively
Trump's work -- and how that has driven many, including Riley's
alleged killer, to migrate to the US. Prokop: "But reality is
also more complicated than Trump's promises that he'll fix
everything by getting tougher once he's president."
Brian Resnick: [03-22]
The total solar eclipse is returning to the United States --
better than before: "This will be the last total solar eclipse
over the contiguous United States for 21 years." I find myself
with zero interest in looking up, much less traveling to do so,
but family and friends in Arkansas are lobbying for visitors,
and I know some people who are going. April 8 is the date.
Dylan Scott: [03-22]
Kate Middleton's cancer diagnosis is part of a frightening global
trend: "More and more young people are getting cancer." I have
zero interest in her, or in any of "those ridiculous people" (John
Oliver's apt turn of phrase), and so I've ignored dozens of pieces
on them recently, but there's something more going on here. Every
category of cancer they used is more common among ages 14-49 than
it was in 1990. My wife swears it's environmental, and while I can
think of statistical variations, I'm inclined to agree.
Jeffrey St Clair: [03-22]
Roaming Charges: L'état sans merci. "Willie Pye is dead and
Georgia is back in the execution business." This introduces a
long section on what passes for justice in America. Much more,
of course. For more on Pye, see:
Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins: [03-20]
The problematic past, present, and future of inequality studies:
Interview with Branko Milanovic, whose lates book is Visions of
Inequality: From the French Revolution to the End of the Cold War.
Dodai Stewart: [03-16]
You're not being gaslit, says a new book. (Or are you?) Review
of Kate Abramson: On Gaslighting. Demands precision of a
phenomenon that is deliberately imprecise ("all kinds of interactions --
lying, guilt-tripping, manipulation"; "a multi-dimensional horror
show"). Cites Harry G Frankfurt's On Bullshit (2005) as a
"spiritual forebear."
Astra Taylor/Leah Hunt-Hendrix: [03-21]
The one idea that could save American democracy: Tied to the
authors' new book,
Solidarity: The Past, Present, and Future of a World-Changing
Idea. Also:
By the way, I just found a link to audio for
Astra Taylor: [2023-11-17]
The Age of Insecurity: 2023 CBC Massey Lectures, with five
hour-long lectures corresponding to the book I just read, and
recommend as highly as possible -- I'd go so far as to say that
she's the smartest person writing on the left these days. I was
pointed to the lectures by a daanis
tweet: "I finally listened to
@astradisastra
Massey Lectures on my way to Boston, just mainlined them one
after another straight into my brain, and added her language
about precarity and insecurity into my own remarks about
surviving together by becoming kin."
Maureen Tkacik: [03-11]
'Return what you stole and be a man with dignity': "Doctors
didn't think it was possible to loathe the world's biggest health
care profiter any more. Then came the hack that set half their
bookkeeping systems on fire." About the ransomware outage at
Change Healthcare, which is owned by UnitedHealth ("the nation's
fifth-largest company").
Bryan Walsh: [03-22]
Baseball superstar Shohei Ohtani has been caught up in a gambling
controversy. He won't be the last. One of the biggest changes in
my lifetime has been the changed attitude toward gambling, which
in my mother's day was a degenerative sin indulged by lowlifes,
much to the profit of mobsters. Today the mobsters have turned
into Republican billionaires -- hard to say whether that's a step
up or down ethically -- and their rackets have moved out into the
open. For a long time, the shame of the Black Sox kept the lid on
sports gambling, but that's been totally blown open in the recent
years. I hate it, which doesn't mean I want to try to ban it, but
those involved are no better than criminals, and should be reminded
of it as often as possible.
Ask a question, or send a comment.
|