Sunday, April 14, 2024
Speaking of Which
My company left Saturday afternoon, so I didn't really get started
on this until then. Sunday I started feeling sick, and ran out of
energy. No idea whether Monday will be better or worse, so I figured
I might as well post this while I can. Maybe I'll circle back later.
Big news stories are pretty much the same as they've been of late,
so you pretty much know where I stand on them.
Not a lot of music this week, but if I'm up to it, I'll try to
post what I have sometime Monday. Another pending problem is that
I'm unable to send email, and Cox doesn't seem to have anyone
competent to work on the problem until Monday.
Notable tweets:
Yousef Munayyer
[04-03]:
Joe Biden knows backing Israel's genocide in Gaza could cost him the
election he says American democracy depends on.
Joe Biden doesn't care.
Imagine hating Palestinians so much as a US president that you'd
throw away American democracy for it.
Steve Hoffman
[04-10]:
[meme]: Christians warn us about the anti-Christ for 2,000 years,
and when he finally shows up, they buy a bible from him.
Rick Perlstein
[04-10]:
I mean, protecting criminal presidents from accountability actually
is perfectly on-brand for an organization devoted to the legacy of
Gerald Ford.
[link:
Famed photographer quits Ford over Liz Cheney snub]
Initial count: 188 links, 6,611 words.
Top story threads:
Israel:
Mondoweiss:
Eman Alhaj Ali: [04-10]
This year, Eid in Gaza is bittersweet.
Ruwaida Kamal Amer:
Michael Arria: [04-11]
The Shift: Are the Dems shifting on Israel? "More Democrats are
beginning to criticize Israel, but it will add up to an actual policy
shift?"
James Bamford: [04-12]
How US intelligence and an American company feed Israel's killing
machine in Gaza. "Now, soldiers and intelligence specialists are
being trained at Camp Moshe Dayan to finish the job -- to bomb, shoot,
or starve to death the descendants of the Palestinians forced into the
squalor of militarily occupied Gaza decades ago."
Ramzy Baroud: [04-12]
Killing humanitarian workers as a strategy: Israel's endgame in
Gaza.
Isaac Chotiner:
Jonathan Cook: [04-09]
Israel's killing of aid workers is no accident. It's part of the plan
to destroy Gaza.
Dave DeCamp:
Keith Gessen: [04-13]
Is this Israel's forever war?: "Foreign-policy analysts whose
careers were shaped by the war on terror see troubling parallels."
The way I'd put it is that Israel has been in a "forever war" since
1948, and they were psychologically prepped for "forever war" much
earlier. They say they always have to fight because of antisemitism,
and there's certainly been lots of that, but their wars since 1948
have just generated more antisemitism, and more war -- even when
you seem to be winning, they just go on, like, forever.
Especially
when you set out to conquer other people, they fight back, and if
you beat them down, they fight back again. Britain went to war in
the 16th century, and was almost continuously at war somewhere or
other until they gave up on their colonies in the 1960s (or the
1990s before they settled the "troubles" in Northern Ireland). The
US was continuously at war from the day Henry Luce proclaimed the
"American Century" until, well, still working on "forever." In
time, Americans walked away from several wars -- most obviously,
Afghanistan and Vietnam, which were never going to surrender their
independence.
Sahar Ghumkhor: [04-08]
For Israel's TikTok serial killers, there is a pleasure in inflicting
racial terror in Gaza.
Faris Giacaman: [04-10]
The Palestine Walid saw, from the little prison to the big
prison.
Eliza Griswold: [03-21]
The children who lost limbs in Gaza: "More than a thousand
children who were injured in the war are now amputees."
Tareq S Hajjaj: [04-11]
'Come out, you animals': how the massacre at al-Shifa Hospital
happened.
Tony Karon/Daniel Levy: [04-11]
After the carnage: "Solutions crafted by outsiders to avoid,
suppress, and restrict Palestinian agency are bound to fail.
Palestinians should decide their own future." How dumb (or
senselessly cruel) do you have to be not to understand this?
Back on Oct. 8, I dusted off my plan for a free Gaza, the only
real requirements being that Israel has no control or presence
and that the people of Gaza be free to select their own leaders
and organize themselves as they see fit. Democratic processes
and individual rights could be conditions for receiving aid,
which Gaza needed sorely even then, but the right to select
their leaders, form of government, etc., is theirs and theirs
alone. Otherwise, they'll never be wholly responsible for their
own actions. If they elect Hamas, I'll pity them, but I shouldn't
be able to stop them. And Israel, having shown nothing but contempt
and inhumanity to Gaza and its people ever since 1948, doesn't
deserve any hearing at all.
Menachem Klein: [04-09]
Netanyahu isn't the only one interested in prolonging the war:
"A broad coalition of political forces, from Israel's far right to
the Zionist left, have different motivations for turning the war
into the new normal."
Ibtisam Mahdi: [04-10]
Against the magnitude of death, our pens feel powerless in Gaza:
"Israel's onslaught made me a refugee, a bereaved sister, and a mother
to starving children. My journalistic endeavors have become almost
impossible."
Nina Martin: [04-13]
How famine and starvation can affect generations to come:
"Research on WWII's Dutch 'Hunger Winter' has terrifying implications
for Gaza's children -- and for their children."
Qassam Muaddi: [04-14]
Unleashed: Israeli settlers rampage through West Bank villages, kill
two people, injure dozens: "Israeli settlers went on a two-day
rampage in the region northeast of Ramallah when a settler teenager
was reported missing on Friday. They burned dozens of houses and
killed two Palestinians, while effectively blockading some ten
villages."
James Ray: [04-12]
The killing of Ismail Haniyeh's children exposes Israel's weakness:
"Israel has always punitively killed the families of leaders and
resistance figures as collective punishment. It is a sign of Israel's
inability to extract a military victory on the ground." Doesn't it
also suggest some "soft" targets for the "eye-for-an-eye" crowd? My
own way of thinking is that identifying a credible opposition leader
like Haniyeh presents an opportunity to negotiate, to find common
grounds and convert an enemy into a partner. Killing his family just
makes any such resolution more difficult. It sends the message that
you can never trust us, because we'll never be satisfied until we
kill you and everything and everyone you hold dear. As long as that's
Israel's position, it's hard to blame Hamas for any form of resistance,
even acts that out of context seem completely abhorrent.
Fayyha Shalash: [04-11]
Israel shuts down a town in the occupied West Bank, cancelling Eid
for Palestinians.
Jeffrey St Clair: [04-13]
Intolerable cruelty: Diary of a genocidal war.
Mosab Abu Toha: [02-24]
My family's daily struggle to find food in Gaza.
Maknoon Wani: [04-09]
Israel's spy-tech industry is a global threat to democracy.
Robin Wright: [03-22]
What it takes to give Palestinians a voice: "A new poll conducted
during war in Gaza and escalating tensions in the West Bank allows
Palestinians to tell the world what they want for their future."
I'm pretty skeptical of this, partly because it's pretty easy to
rig polls to produce certain results, but also because Palestinians
have no real sense of what can be done -- nearly everything one can
imagine is proscribed by Israel -- and also no real accountability
from their leaders.
Israel vs. Iran:
Will Porter:
James Carden: [04-14]
Benjamin Netanyahu is trying to drag the US into war with Iran.
Juan Cole: [04-14]
Netanyahu, empowered by Biden's grant of impunity, baits Iran into
his genocidal Gaza war.
Dave DeCamp: [04-14]
Israel's missile defense against Iran attack estimated to cost over
$1 billion.
Kevin Drum: [04-13]
Iran sues for peace:
Drones? And a few small missiles? All of which Iran knew would be
routinely shot down? This was obviously intended to be a pinprick
attack, just enough to save face but not to do any serious damage.
It couldn't be more obvious if Iran spelled out a message on the moon.
This is similar to Iran's measured response to Trump's assassination
of General Soleimani: one flurry of firepower that was inconsequential,
then Iran announced they were satisfied as long as they didn't have to
respond to further attacks.
Belén Fernández: [04-14]
Sorry, but Iran is not the aggressor here: "Amid the Israeli genocide
in Gaza, Western condemnation of the intercepted Iranian attack on Israel
is sickeningly cynical."
Mel Gurtov: [04-14]
The Israel=Iran confrontation: Episode or war?
Michael Hirsh:
Iran's attack seems like it was designed to fail. So what comes
next?
Murtaza Hussain:
Israel and Israel alone kicked off this escalation -- in a bid to drag
the US into war with Iran.
Patrick Kingsley: [04-14]
Strikes upend Israel's belief about Iran's willingness to fight it
directly: "Israel had grown used to targeting Iranian officials
without head-on retaliation from Iran, an assumption overturned by
Iran's attacks on Saturday." Also in the New York Times, their
idiot-savant columnists offer what they imagine to be helpful
advice while reassuring us of their loyalties:
Daniel Larison: [04-12]
Biden should not follow Netanyahu into war with Iran: "The Israeli
government appears to want to goad Tehran into a military response to
divert attention from the slaughter and famine in Gaza and to trap the
US into joining the fight."
Aaron Maté: [04-14]
Seeking Middle East 'quiet,' Biden fuels regional carnage.
Trita Parsi: [04-14]
Iran launches risky attack on Israel: "Biden could have thwarted it,
but chose to put Netanyahu before US, which is now at risk of getting
dragged into war tonight."
Vijay Prashad: [04-12]
Violating diplomatic missions.: "From Israel's bombing of Iran's
embassy in Damascus to Ecuador's raid on the Mexican in Quito, leaders
feel emboldened by the impunity granted by the Global North."
Barak Ravid: [04-14]
Biden told Bibi US won't support an Israeli counterattack on Iran.
Scrolling down I see earlier posts: "Iran launches retaliatory drone
and missile attack on Israel"; "Iran warns US to stay out of fight
with Israel or face attack on troops"; "Biden returns to the White
House as imminent Iranian attack on Israel is possible."
Ali Rizk: [04-09]
Hezbollah leader ups ante after attack on Iranian consulate.
Israel vs. world opinion:
Nadeine Asbali: [04-12]
Does anyone in the UK really know what 'British values' are?
Perhaps not, but I wouldn't be surprised to find that people in Ireland,
India, Palestine, and dozens of other former colonies have a pretty good
idea of "British values." I even know a few things about them from 1775
America.
Synne Furnes Bjerkestrand/Bayan Abu Ta'ema: [04-13]
Jordanian protesters demand ending normalization with Israel, despite
arrests.
Ellen Cantarow: [04-14]
Dead on arrival: Israel's blowback genocide.
Helena Cobban: [03-18]
It's past time to end the demonization of Hamas.
Marjorie Cohn: [04-14]
Nicaragua takes Germany to the World Court: "Germany is second
only to the US as the largest supplier of weapons to Israel."
Jack Crosbie: [04-09]
l
Inside the pro-Palestine movement bird-dogging Biden everywhere he
goes: "These activists turned Biden's ritzy New York City fundraiser
into a night of protests against Israel's war in Gaza."
Richard Falk: [04-12]
Western powers never believed in a rules-based order.
Saleema Gul: [04-10]
Debate over political response to Gaza genocide marks pivotal moment
for Muslim Americans.
Ali Harb: [03-11]
'Reject AIPAC': US progressives join forces against pro-Israel lobby
group: AIPAC is the dominant American lobby for whichever faction
is currently in power in Israel -- effectively it is a tool of Israeli
foreign policy, as tightly controlled as the diplomatic and espionage
efforts -- and it has built such vast influence over both US parties
that nearly every politician in Washington follows whatever line they'
are given. One way they enforce their power is by recruiting and funding
primary challenges, especially to progressive Democrats who recognize
social injustice even when it's practiced in Israel. So this is, in
jargon Israelis should understand, self-defense, or as those behind
Reject AIPAC put it, "a crucial step in putting voters back at
the center of our democracy."
Katherine Hearst: [04-09]
Naomi Klein enters the mirror world of conspiracy, colonialism and
fascism: On the use of Klein's Doppelganger for understanding
"the current Israeli onslaught on Gaza."
Abir Kopty: [04-13]
Police raid Berlin conference as repression of Palestine activism
escalates in Germany.
Robert Kuttner: [04-08]
If not now, when?: "Has Biden's pressure finally ended Israel's
war on Gaza's civilians? O4r is the US allowing Bibi one more head
fake?"
Blaise Malley: [04-09]
Samantha Power: Aid workers says crisis in Gaza 'unprecedented'.
Branko Marcetic: [04-13]
Biden's attempt to get tough on Netanyahu quietly failed.
Mitchell Plitnick: [04-13]
The liberal Jewish community is beginning to fracture over the Gaza
genocide: "J Street is reportedly losing staff and support as
they prioritize Israeli militarism over Palestinian rights. The
Gaza genocide is revealing the tension between Zionism and liberal
Jewish values, a divide which will only continue to grow more stark."
Dahlia Scheindlin: [03-26]
Inside Israel's disturbing denial of starvation in Gaza.
Rick Sterling: [04-09]
From Six Day Victory to Six Month Failure: "As Israel's international
stature grew after the Six Day War, it is collapsing after the Six Month
Siege and Massacre in Gaza."
Ramsey Telhami: [04-11]
I resigned from World Central Kitchen because it refused to tell the
truth about the Israeli genocide in Gaza.
Yanis Varoufakis: [04-13]
The speech that got me banned from Germany. "Judge for yourselves
what kind of society Germany is becoming if its police ban the
sentiments below."
Philip Weiss: [04-08]
Biden has no emotional attachment to Israel, it's about politics.
America's increasingly desperate and pathetic empire:
Election notes:
Robert F Kennedy Jr: And suddenly we have a cluster of
stories on the third-party candidate:
Trump, and other Republicans: But first, let's open up
some space to talk about abortion politics:
David W Chen/Michael Wines: [04-10]
How the GOP molded the Arizona court that upheld the abortion
ban: "Arizona's former governor, Doug Ducey, expanded the court
to seven justices. All solid conservatives, they upheld a 160-year-old
abortion ban that presents a political risk to Republicans."
Rachel M Cohen: [04-11]
Florida and Arizona show why abortion attacks are not slowing
down: "The judges aren't done."
Susan B Glasser: [04-11]
Donald Trump did this: "On abortion, Arizona, and the 2024
Presidential election."
Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling:
Kari Lake is trying to make people forget her real abortion
stance.
Sarah Jones: [04-11]
Abortion opponents can't be 'pro-family'.
Ed Kilgore: [04-10]
In a first, Arizona Republicans rush to dismantle a total abortion
ban.
Eric Levitz: [04-09]
Arizona's ban spotlights the fraudulence of Trump's "moderation" on
abortion.
Dahlia Lithwick: [04-12]
Arizona's atrocious abortion law is just the latest example of what
Roe didn't protect.
Harold Meyerson: [04-11]
On the origins of Arizona's new old abortion ban. If Dobbs had
been less of a political hatchet job, they would have started by
clearing the field of all pre-Roe bans, and also of the recent
"trigger bills," forcing states to at least think about what they
were doing. Still, even people who anticipated such rude shocks
were taken aback by this case, a law passed 48 years before Arizona
had enough [white] people to qualify as a state, even before the
end of slavery.
Anna North: [04-08]
Trump may sound moderate on abortion. The groups setting his agenda
definitely aren't.
Nikki McCann Ramirez: [04-10]
Fox News' prime-time shows mentioned Arizona's abortion ban exactly
zero times.
Bill Scher: [04-09]
Trump can't run from his biggest accomplishment: Overturning Roe.
Michael Tomasky:
Trump's abortion gambit proves he's bad a politics.
Bob Topper: [04-14]
Roe v. Wade: Reasoned v. the right.
Ali Breland: [04-13]
Kamala Harris isn't letting Trump dodge on abortion.
We can also group several stories on Trump's court date
on Monday in New York:
That hardly exhausts their capacity for senseless cruelty, starting
with their Fearless Führer:
Biden and/or the Democrats:
Jonathan Chait:
David Dayen: [04-10]
TSMC chips deal promotes the logic of Biden's industrial policy.
John Nichols: [04-05]
More than half a million Democratic voters have told Biden: Save
Gaza! "The campaign to use 'uncommitted' primary votes to send
a message to Biden has won two dozen delegates, and it keeps growing."
I'm sorry, but these are not impressive numbers. And it is telling
that you don't actually have a candidate -- one more credible than
the underappreciated Marianne Williamson, that is -- leading the
challenge (as Eugene McCarthy did in 1968). The obvious difference
is that Americans were more directly impacted by war in Vietnam
than they are now in Gaza: even though many of us are immensely
alarmed by Israel's genocide, its impact on our everyday life is
very marginal. Also, Biden is widely seen by Democrats (if rarely
by anyone else) as the safe option to defend against Trump, who
most Democrats do regard as a clear and present danger. The main
reason there is that the all-important donor class seems to be
satisfied with Biden, but would surely throw a fit (as Bloomberg
did in 2020) if anyone like Sanders or Warren made a serious run
for the nomination. Also, perhaps, that back in 1968, few people
really understood how bad throwing the election to a Republican
would turn out to be.
Evan Osnos: [04-06]
Joe Biden and US policy toward Israel.
Matt Stieb: [04-11]
Biden's leverage campaign against Bibi isn't producing dramatic
results.
Legal matters and other crimes:
Climate and environment:
Economic matters:
Ukraine War:
Connor Echols: [04-12]
Diplomacy Watch: Ukraine risks losing the war -- and the peace:
"It's now unclear if the US Congress will ever manage to send more
aid to Kyiv."
Dave DeCamp:
John Mueller: [04-09]
Ukraine war ceasefire may require accepting a partition: "Kyiv
wound likely see significant economic and political benefits --
and move closer to the West -- from a cessation of hostilities."
This has become obvious a year ago, but after Ukraine recovered
territory along the northeast and southwest fronts in late 2022,
they held out big hopes for their much-hyped "spring offensive"
of 2023. Nine months later, the "gains" were slightly negative.
Since then, most of the action has been away from the unmovable
front: notably drone attacks on Russian oil refineries and on
Ukrainian power plants. Which is to say, punitive terror attacks,
reminders of the ongoing cost of war that have no bearing on its
conclusion. Before the war, there were two basic options: one was
the Minsk agreements, which would have unified Ukraine but given
Russian minority rights that could have kept western Ukraine from
moving toward economic integration with Europe; the other was to
allow secession following fair referendums, which would almost
certainly have validated the secessionists in Crimea and Donbas
(but probably not elsewhere). In a divided Ukraine, the west
could more easily align with Europe, while the east could keep
its Russian ties. Either of these would have been much preferable
to the war that maximalists on both sides insisted on.
John Quiggin: [04-03]
Navies are obsolete, but no one will admit it: Examples here
start with Russia's Black Sea Fleet, which seems to have provided
little beyond Ukrainian drone target practice, and the US Navy in
the Red Sea, which hasn't been able to thwart Houthi attacks on
Red Sea shipping (Suez Canal traffic is down 70%).
Around the world:
Boeing:
OJ Simpson: Famous football player, broadcaster, convicted
criminal (but famously acquitted on murder charges), dead at 76. I'm
not inclined to care about any of this, but he did elicit another
round of articles:
Other stories:
William J Astore: [04-11]
There is only one spaceship earth: "Freeing the world from the
deadly shadow of genocide and ecocide."
Charlotte Barnett: [04-10]
Declutter, haul, restock, repeat: "The content creators making
a living by cleaning one purs tower, acrylic plastic box, and egg
organizer at a time."
Emmeline Clein: [04-12]
How capitalism disordered our eating: "From Weight Watchers to
Ozempic, big business profits off eating disorders and their
treatments."
Russell Arben Fox: [04-10]
Thinking about Wendell Berry's leftist lament (and more). The Berry
book is The Need to Be Whole: Patriotism and the History of
Prejudice. Also segues into a discussion of Ian Angus: The
War Against the Commons: Dispossession and Resistance in the Making
of Capitalism. The destruction of the commons is a major theme
in Astra Taylor's The Age of Insecurity: Coming Together as Things
Fall Apart, including a critique of the famous "tragedy of the
commons" theory that I was unaware of but long needed. Scrolling
down in Fox's blog, I see a couple pieces I had read in the Wichita
Eagle. (He teaches here in Wichita, and I believe we have mutual
friends, but as far as I know he's not aware of me.)
Robert Kuttner: [04-09]
The political economy of exile: Searching for safe havens from
Trumpism, or escaping from "shithole countries" if you're rich enough.
Michael Ledger-Lomas: [04-14]
The outsize influence of small wars: Review of Laurie Benton's
book, They Called It Peace: Worlds of Imperial Violence.
These "small wars" were mostly directed by European powers against
their would-be colonies, most fought with a huge technological edge
which complemented their legal scheming, distinguishing them from
the large wars Europeans fought against each other. That's pretty
much the same definition Max Boot used in his book, The Savage
Wars of Peace: Small Wars and the Rise of American Power.
Walter G Moss: [04-14]
2024 US anxieties and Hitler 1933: "Here is a friendly reminder
that all it would take for Trump to be elected is a series of mistakes
by the electorate -- many of them not especially earthshaking."
I figured this was a bit far-fetched to include in the section on
Trump, the Republicans, and their more mundane crime interests,
but Hitler-Trump comparisons are a parlor game of some interest for
those who know more than a little about both. Speaking of parlor
games for history buffs, Moss previously wrote:
Yasmin Nair: [03-27]
What really happened at Current Affairs? This looks to be way too
long, pained, deep, and trivial to actually read, but maybe some day.
And having thrown a tantrum or two of my own way back in the days when
I slaved for someone else's parochially leftist journal, it may even
hit close to home. From my vantage point, Nathan J Robinson is a smart,
sensible, and prodigious critic, and Current Affairs is one of my more
reliably insightful sources as I go about my weekly chores. That such
qualities can go hand-in-hand with less admirable traits is, well, not
something I feel secure enough to cast stones over.
John Quiggin: [03-29]
Daniel Kahneman has died.
Ingrid Robeyns: [04-13]
Limitarianism update: Author of the recent book, Limitarianism:
The Case Against Extreme Wealth, with links to reviews, interviews,
etc. Comments suggest that the concept is better than the title.
Luke Savage: [04-13]
The rich: On top of the world and very anxious about it: "The
small handful of ultrawealthy winners are firmly ensconced in their
positions of privilege in power. Yet so many of them seem haunted
by the possibility that maybe they don't deserve it."
Robert Wright: [04-12]
Marc Andreessen's mindless techno-optimism.
Li Zhou: [04-10]
The Vatican's new statement on trans rights undercuts its attempts
at inclusion.
Ask a question, or send a comment.
|