Loose Tabs [Draft File]

This is a safe space for collecting items that may eventually go into a Loose Tabs post.

This is an occasional collection of newsworthy links and comments, much less systematic than what I attempted in my late Speaking of Which posts. The new name comes from my extensive use of browser tabs. When I get around to cleaning up, I often find tabs opened to old articles I might want to comment on and/or refer back to. So these posts are mostly housecleaning, but may also serve as a very limited but persistent record of what 20+ years ago I started calling "the end of the American empire" and nowadays feels more like "the end of civilization." I collect these bits in a draft file, and flush them out when periodically. My previous one appeared ? days ago, on August 17.

I'm trying a new experiment here with select bits of text highlighted with a background color, for emphasis a bit more subtle than bold or ALL CAPS. (I saw this on Medium. I started with their greenish color [#bbdbba] and lightened it a bit [#dbfbda].) I'll try to use it sparingly.


Topical Stories

Sometimes stuff happens, and it dominates the news/opinion cycle for a few days or possibly several weeks. We might as well lead with it, because it's where attention is most concentrated. But eventually these stories will fold into the broader, more persistent thmes of the following section.

Major Threads

Israel: Worse than ever, but main news story as been "Trump's Peace Plan," which (without much research yet, I can safely say) doesn't show much understanding of "peace" or "plan," and is probably just a deniable, insincere feint by Netanyahu. Still, it's hard to imagine Israel accepting any measure of peace without strongarming by the US, so hopeful people are tempted to read more into this than is warranted. Many articles scattered below. I'll try to sum them up later.

  • Michael Arria [10-17]: As support for Israel drops, the mainstream media is becoming even more Zionist: "Support for Israel is plummeting among the US public, but Zionism dominates mainstream media more than ever. Several recent high-profile lexamples show the staggering disconnect between the media establishment and its viewers."

  • Avrum Burg: Former speaker of the Knesset, still trying to keep something he believes in:

    • [10-20]: More ethics less high-tech: I saw this in Mazin Qumsiyeh's newsletter as his "quote of the day," but the link was mangled:

      In global interviews and conversations, one question keeps returning: how could the Jews, a people who once saw themselves as a moral messenger for all humanity, commit such horrific crimes in Gaza? It is a question that cuts to the rawest nerves of our identity, our faith in our righteousness, and our understanding of who we are. . . .

      How cruel the irony. The so-called start up nation, proud to call itself the only democracy in the Middle East, has created the most sophisticated and repressive death industry in the region, exporting its poisonous fruits to any authoritarian buyer for profit. The cult of security has turned high tech into an endless military service. Civilian companies develop for the defense establishment new tools of killing, occupation, and violation of human rights, while the army feeds the civilian market with skilled manpower and profitable technology. Thus an entire economy has been built on domination, oppression, smart sensors, and a dead conscience. . . .

      The Judaism I grew up with was a moral system, not a cult of power. A way of life that sanctified life, not death. It placed the human being, not the land, at its center. It did not seek to rule the world but to repair it. . . .

      Israel after the crimes of Gaza does not need more advanced tanks or sophisticated algorithms. It needs an education system that teaches people to think and to feel. . . . For in the end, all the technology in the world, every smart system, every precise weapon, is worthless when placed in the hands of a hardened heart. Like ours have been in these terrible years.

    • [10-12]: The showman, the reconciler and the cynic — who this trinity must succeed: "Netanyahu will kick and scream, but Trump and Blair can drag Israel into a brighter future for the Middle East." Of course, he's much too generous to all three, but at least he realizes that there is no "brighter future" with Netanyahu still anywhere near power.

  • Qassam Muaddi [10-24]: Trump's push to uphold Gaza ceasefire is creating a political crisis in Israel. Starts with a Vance quote about Israel not being a "vassal state," but the bigger revelation is that Trump seems to be breaking free of the notion that the US is a vassal state of Israel. Much of Netanyahu's credibility within Israel is based on the belief that he possesses magical power to manipulate American politicians, and that belief starts to fade when he slips. The subordination of American interests to Israeli whims really took hold under Clinton, and reached its apogee with Biden, but mostly depended on American indifference to consequences, which genocide is making it harder to sustain. And as Netanyahu slips, Israel is not lacking for others who would like to take his place, whispering sweet nothings into the ears of Americans while keeping a steady course.

  • Robert Gottlieb [10-25]: From Apartheid to Democracy - a 'blueprint' for a different future in Israel-Palestine: A review of a book by Michael Schaeffer Omer-Man and Sarah Leah Wilson, From Apartheid to Democracy: A Blueprint for Peace in Israel-Palestine, which "describes in granular detail the conditions for dismantling apartheid in Israel-Palestine." While I'm happy to see people inside Israel thinking along these lines, I have to ask what world they think they are living in? Democracy has always been a struggle between interest groups to establish a mutually satisfactory division of power. It has sometimes expanded to incorporate previously excluded groups, but mostly because an established insider group thought that expansion might give them more leverage, but it's never been done simply because it seemed like a good idea. Yet that seems to be the pitch here:

    Thus, the Blueprint places the onus on the State of Israel — as the state exercising effective control over all peoples in Israel, East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza — to meet its international legal obligations by ending its crimes and respecting the rights of all people under its rule. Only once Palestinians have political, civic, and human rights equal to Israeli Jews living in the Territory will Palestinians and Israelis be able to democratically determine what political structures and outcomes best server their collective, national, political, ethnic, and religious interests. The Blueprint is not a plan for achieving national self-determination; it is a plan to create the conditions under which achieving self-determination and deciding political issues of governance are possible.

  • James P Rubin [10-27]: The only thing that can keep the peace in Gaza: Author is credited as "a senior adviser to two secretaries of state, Anthony Blinken and Madeleine Albright," which suggests that the only thing he's qualified to do is to write New York Times op-eds. He proves his cluelessness here by focusing on the "international force for Gaza," which he sees as necessary to fill "the growing security vacuum in Gaza." At every step on the way, he puts Israel's phony security complaints ahead of aiding Palestinians. Israel has always been a source of disruption in Gaza, never of stability. Their removal is itself a step toward order, which can be augmented by an ample and unfettered aid program. Granted that the supply lines need a degree of security to prevent looting, but the better they work, the less trouble they'll elicit. Rubin's claim to fame here seems to be that he's spent a lot of time talking to Tony Blair about this. Blair is pretty high up on the list of people no honest Palestinian can trust in. Rubin's earned a spot on that list as well.

  • Vivian Yee [10-27]: US assessment of Israeli shooting of journalist divided American officials: "A US colonel has gone public with his concern that official findings about the 2022 killing of a Palestinian American reporter were soft-pedaled to appease Israel." The journalist, you may recall, was Shireen Abu Akleh. The Biden administration "found no reason to believe this was intentional," and attributed it to "tragic circumstances."

  • Abdaljawad Omar [10-27]: Israel seeks redemption in the Gaza ruins: "Throughout the Gaza war, Israel has d ebated what to call it. The military says 'October 7 War,' while Netanyahu wants 'War of Redemption.' What's clear is that Israel believes it can only resolve its ongoing cycle of crisis through genocidal violence." Notes that name chosen for the military operation was originally "Swords of Iron" (derived from "Iron Wall": "the fantasy of unbreakable security through permanent domination"), but that's hard to distinguish from every other exercise in collective punishment inflicted on Gaza since 2006. The military preference "fixes the war to a date of trauma, as if to anchor the nation's moral position in the moment of its own suffering," which is to say that they see one day's violent outburst as justifying everything that came after, the details hardly worth mentioning. But that at least treats the war as a collective national experience. Netanyahu's "War of Redemption" is his way of saying that the war (by which we mean genocide) simply proves that he and his political faction were right all along. This makes it a war to dominate Israel as much as it is a war to destroy Palestine.

  • Adrienne Lynett/Mira Nablusi [10-26]: From the margins to the mainstream: how the Gaza genocide transformed US public opinion: "Two years into the Gaza genocide, public opinion on Israel, Palestine, and US policy has undergone a profound shift. A close examination of poll data shows Palestine is no longer a niche issue but one with real electoral consequences." Which might matter in a real democracy, but in a nation where politics is controlled by the donor class, Israel still exercises inordinate influence. Still, as long as Israel remains a niche issue — something a few people feel strongly about, but which most people can ignore — I doubt that shifting opinion polls will have much effect. But it's impossible to be a credible leftist without taking a stand against genocide and apartheid. And Democrats need the left more than ever, because they need to provide a credible, committed, trustworthy opposition to the Trump right.

Russia/Ukraine:

Trump Regime: Practically every day I run across disturbing, often shocking stories of various misdeeds proposed and quite often implemented by the Trump Administration -- which in its bare embrace of executive authority we might start referring to as the Regime. Collecting them together declutters everything else, and emphasizes the pattern of intense and possibly insane politicization of everything. Pieces on the administration.

Donald Trump (Himself): As for Il Duce, we need a separate bin for stories on his personal peccadillos -- which often seem like mere diversions, although as with true madness, it can still be difficult sorting serious incidents from more fanciful ones.

Democrats:

Republicans: A late addition, back by popular demand, because it isn't just Trump, we also have to deal with the moral swamp he crawled out of:


Miscellaneous Pieces

The following articles are more/less in order published, although some authors have collected pieces, and some entries have related articles underneath.

Henry Farrell [10-16]: China has copied America's grab for semiconductor power: "Six theses about the consequences." Mostly that the adversarial relationship between the US and China can easily get much worse. Or, as the last line puts it: "The risks of unanticipated and mutually compounding fuck-ups are very, very high."


Some notable deaths: Mostly from the New York Times listings. Last time I did such a trawl was on July 20, so we'll look that far back (although some names have appeared since):

Tweets: I've usually used this section for highlighting clever responses and/or interesting ideas, but maybe I should just use it to bookmark some of our leading horribles.