Index
Latest
2024
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2023
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2022
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2021
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2020
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2019
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2018
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2017
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2016
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2015
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2014
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2013
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2012
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2011
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2010
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2009
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2008
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2007
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2006
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2005
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2004
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2003
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2002
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
2001
Dec
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
|
Sunday, October 31, 2021
NOEL: The Struggle Over the Veterans Health Administration
There are huge asymmetries between America's two political parties.
One of the most maddening is how quickly Americans forget when Republicans
screw things up, which is all the time, and for the simplest of reasons.
The one big idea that Republicans have is that they should hobble government,
to turn its functions over to private enterprise, and to free business from
oversight and regulation. When Republicans prevail, three things inevitably
happen: businesses turn predatory, they take greater risks in pursuit of
profit, and they dump their wastes and mistakes onto the public. Well, make
that four: they concentrate wealth among the already rich, while making a
mockery of our belief in justice.
But if that's so obvious, why do we keep forgiving them? Why give them
another chance, as happened in 1994 and 2010, when Republicans reclaimed
the House only two years after being swept out of the Presidency? And
after Trump's mob made an even greater mess, why do pundits still expect
a Republican resurgence in 2022? In other words, why when Republicans
screw up, so many of us trust Democrats even less to fix the mistakes?
There are two ways to look at this question, and both are relevant.
On the one hand, few people understand how things actually work, which
leaves us vulnerable to half-truths and convenient homilies backed
by special interest groups. On the other hand, Republicans have built
a relentless propaganda machine that is constantly attacking Democrats,
not just for real shortcomings but for all sorts of fantastical crimes
that are only rooted in the fevered imaginations of right-wing pundits.
Democrats have long been ineffective at countering either of these
thrusts. Explaining how things work is too boring, and responding to
madness in kind is too disrespectful, so again and again they stand
blinded and take the beating. If only they had opponents who were
sensible and sincere, but that's exactly what Republicans aren't.
If you want a concrete example, took at
Suzanne Gordon and Jasper Craven: The VA Is Ripe for Right-Wing Attacks.
Here's How Biden Can Stop Them. In the 1990s under Clinton-appointee
Kenneth Kizer, the VHA had become the highest-performing, most cost-effective
organization in the sad-but-glitzy universe of American health care, but
since 2001 Republicans have been picking it apart -- while flooding the
system with new casualties -- making it easy to air complaints about slow
service and other shortcomings. The key sentence here is this:
The right knows how to undermine veterans' health care while simultaneously
winning political points on the negative outcomes their own policies have
wrought.
That is, in short, the magic Republican formula: mess things up and
blame the Democrats. This overlooks the one great advantage VHA has: it
is non-profit, the closest thing the US has to a NHS. It can, in short,
dispense with profit measurements and solely pursue health outcomes,
with strong confidence that a healthier system will save money in the
long run. The problem I see is that VHA is limited to veterans for its
patient pool, and the percentage of the American public that serves in
its armed forces is small and dwindling. Right now, VHA is having
trouble serving veterans in remote areas, because the patients are
too few and far between. But the system could grow considerably if we
let more people use it. It could, for instance, offer its services like
an HMO, at attractive prices (at compared to private insurance). One
could transition from its current patient limits by adding other public
employees (who, very often, provide more useful services than does the
military). Not that I like the idea of limiting it to a subset of the
public -- least of all to the military caste many Americans like to
fetishize. An expanded National Health Service could provide a nice
"public option" alternative to the private sector, whose profit-seeking
approaches the predatory. An easy path here would be to make VHA an
option for Medicaid.
Of course, before any such thing can happen, we have to get past
the mental obstacle course Republicans have laid (and Democrats have
way too often fallen for). In the 1990s, the VHA proved that capable
and conscientious leadership, safe from political corruption,
can deliver superior health care services. That is government at work
for you, in sharp contrast to politicians who serve a private sector
system that is based
on market failures and run like an extortion racket. But Republicans
will deny that, and blame their own failures on everyone else (like
their efforts to crucify public servants like Anthony Fauci). And
they seem credible, because who is cynical enough to imagine that
Republican intentions are as malign as their results? An increasing
number, but not yet enough to definitively reject Republican rhetoric,
even among Democratic leaders who should know better than anyone what
they are facing.
By the way, the "Here's how Biden can stop them" section is by far
the weakest in the article. All they suggest appointing a "talented
undersecretary." That would help, but we need a more fundamental sea
change in thinking about what, and whom, government is for.
Daily Log
Tweet:
Streamnotes (October 2021): Nothing new here, but finished my indexing
and buttoned the file down. 218 records this month, mostly old stuff
because I've been cleaning house ("unrated" list cut by 25%):
link.
Saturday, October 30, 2021
Notes on Everyday Life
Spent some time today dicking around with my WordPress site
notesoneverydaylife.com. Updated the WordPress software to 5.8.1,
which introduced this new "block editor" that, frankly, doesn't work
very well, or at least doesn't make much sense. I previously set up
the site on September 12, 2018, but couldn't find my original writing
there, so edited the existing first post, to this:
Notes on Everyday Life
I started writing about politics and society in 1972, when I joined
a small group in St. Louis intent on publishing a underground paper,
called Notes on Everyday Life. We worked on it two years,
publishing a dozen tabloid issues (or so, probably less). The title
reflected our critical theory that politics permeated every facet of
culture, and everything everyday had implications for
politics. Dialectics were fashionable, and provided a model of complex
interactions. As in any political group, there were endless
discussion. My career in rock criticism started in those debates.
In the mid-1970s, I moved on: got a job, made some money, got
married, had friends, learned a new trade, struggled with various
health problems, got past my wife's death, kept reading (mostly
science). I started thinking about politics again around 1990, when I
started with my second wife. She grew up on the left, and had never
wavered in her commitments, something I admired her for even though I
rarely lived up to her model. We were, at least, philosophically
compatible. And I was appalled by the Reagan turn to the right, even
though I wasn't an obvious victim. (As I explained to people at the
time, the only growth industry in America was fraud.) My alarm
continued to grow through the 1990s until September 2001, when
G.W. Bush grabbed his megaphone on "ground zero" and vowed vengeance
on anyone who dared challenge the power and hubris of America's ruling
class.
I had started blogging a bit before then, but mostly just noting
trivia like what I thought of records and movies. Since then
I've written several million words on
political issues. At some point, I remembered my old St. Louis
publication, and registered the domain name. This is the third or
fourth iteration of a website there. My plan is to write occasional
short notes of relevance here, not just on obvious political matters
but also on broader cultural concerns -- since they remain linked,
probably more obviously so than at any point in my life. Not to put
too fine a point on it, that's because the post-Reagan Republicans
have become dedicated degraders and destructors of civilization
itself. They hate you, and they mean to hurt you. It has never been
more urgent to stand up to their attacks. The only way I know how to
do that is through reason, so that's what this website is for.
I started working on the Internet back in the mid-1990s. My
previous sites have been crafted using my own tools and coding, so
this one, based as it is on the free software WordPress, is a bit of
learning curve. Some things I expect to be easier, and some more
frustrating. I hope to be able to write more short pieces, on a more
timely basis. I also expect that I'll be able to slip in some older
excerpts from my previous 20 years of writing. In theory, this tool
also supports collaboration more easily than my other sites. I'd
especially like to see some of my old comrades join in.
Subsequently, I found the page I had originally written (which
didn't appear because it was a page and not a post). It covers
much the same ground. For the record:
Back in the early 1970s, I fell in with four other young leftists,
mostly fellow students at Washington University in St. Louis. They
wanted to publish an underground radical rag, and "Notes on Everyday
Life" was their suggested title. This came readily upon the discovery
that the personal was political as well as vice versa, and that both
were connected to the technology and social relations of production
and distribution, something so all pervasive that it permeated all
human culture. We were curious about how all this worked, but under it
all we were unhappy about the inequities that resulted and the
violence that the system depended upon. In 1972, for instance, the US
was still engaged in the longest and most dishonest war in the history
of the republic, while the US president was engaged in the most
cynical and callous acts to date to undermine democracy. We didn't
figure we could do much about this, but by poking at the frayed edges
of what seemed like a system, we felt we could raise a bit of
consciousness, the more questions people would ask about what's worth
doing and what isn't.
Little did we know then that forty-some years later the period of
time we were so unsettled by would come to resemble a lost golden era,
the point in US history when incomes and outcomes were closer to being
equitable than before or since, a period of great reforms and
transformations, a period of relative reason, one where the courts
sided with an expansion of freedom, and after Vietnam one of relative
peace and prosperity. But to be fair to ourselves, it now appears as
though the tide had already turned -- I now make the "peak oil" year
of 1969 to have been pivotal, but the 1970s saw the emergence of an
ever more aggressive financial class and the always corruptible
American political system soon succumbed.
After a couple years, we moved on: one toward a sociology Ph.D.,
one wound up teaching remedial high school, one emerged as a slumlord
in St. Louis. I became an amateur rock critic and a professional
software engineer, only to find post-2001 events push me back into
writing more about politics again. Sensing that
my website had become
torn between those interested in music and those preoccupied with
politics, I thought it would be a good idea to sort my interests out
into two relatively specialized websites, and I named each for an
early effort at publishing:
Terminal Zone for music,
Notes on Everyday Life for more political interests --
admittedly, a division we wouldn't have embraced in the early 1970s,
when Notes had much to say about music. Still, those sites
floundered, with earlier iterations wiped out by a server failure. The
first drafts of both were mostly cloned from my blog. I don't really
have a plan at the moment: just two domain names, a dedicated server,
and some software to learn.
Certainly one way I might like this to develop would be if some
young nerdy types were to pick up on the original ideas we were tuned
into and apply them anew. Given how far America has backslid, much of
what we thought all but too obvious forty years ago needs to be
relearned today.
Lots of things are confusing at this point. These include:
Site health: complaint site is running PHP 5.6.40. Cpanel does have
a multi-PHP version tool, but only other options are 7.1 and 7.2. Current
PHP is 7.4, with PHP 8.0 in the wings. Evidently PHP 7.4 isn't installed
on server. How to fix that?
Missing PHP modules: exif, fileinfo, mbstring, imagick, zip,
iconv.
Your website does not use HTTPS. Yet actual url is
https://notesoneverydaylife.com/, so WTF is going on here?
[This seems to be fixed.]
Tuesday, October 26, 2021
Music Week
Expanded blog post,
October archive
(done).
Tweet: Music Week: 54 albums, 11 A-list, quite a bit for a week
where I took a couple days out to cook birthday dinner.
Music: Current count 36534 [36480] rated (+54), 149 [159] unrated (-10).
Took a break from the computer yesterday, playing oldies and cooking
dinner to celebrate my 71st birthday. That puts me a year older than
my grandfather was -- he believed the Bible promised "three score and
ten" years, and died right on schedule. That leaves me five years short
of my father. I never knew my mother's parents, neither of whom made it
to 70. My father's mother lived into her 90s, but suffered from dementia
her last decade or more. My sister died at age 60. She was the last born
and the youngest to die among the cohort of 20 cousins on my mother's
side. And my younger brother is struggling with more health issues than
I am (or than I know about). So I approached the date with a bit of grim
foreboding.
We had eight people total, four older than me, three younger, but
only one who had to think about work the next day. All were vaccinated.
One topic discussed was family members who are becoming ostracized for
their refusal: the word "selfish" was used to describe them. I'm pretty
sympathetic to laissez faire arguments, but I've lost my patience for
them, regardless of their motivations. I'm particularly bothered by the
bad faith of people who campaign against other getting vaccinated --
even if you thought there was a risk in being vaccinated (and I don't
see that there is one), wouldn't encouraging others to become immunized
help protect yourself? It's hard to see their logic as anything short
of political, and that's where the malevolence shows through. I'm even
more irked by anti-vaxers who claim any form of patriotism or religion
or community spirit, as their efforts are aimed at undermining all of
those things. But I should also note that while the political right has
claimed anti-vaccination, and therefore promoting the spread of pandemic,
many of the people we know who have refused to get vaccinated are highly
critical of the right: they are cynical about business and politics, and
are often committed to what I can only describe as extra-scientific
health fads. I find these people even more frustrating to argue with
or be critical of.
By the way, Laura and I got Pfizer booster shots recently. I got a
flu shot earlier this week, while I was out grocery shopping. And Sadie
(Liz Fink's orphaned dog) got her mandated shots today.
The only birthday gift I hope for is that my guests will submit
gracefully to letting me cook for them.
I started the tradition back in the 1990s, usually
using it as the excuse for a fairly deep dive into a foreign cuisine
(first was Chinese, second Indian, and I've since done Turkish, Thai,
Spanish, French, Greek, Russian, Korean, Mexican, Brazilian, several
variations on Middle Eastern). Last year we ate Turkish and Moroccan
food in the backyard. This year my exotic food venture was directed
at the US South. I always like my mother's
coconut cake for birthday, and it occurred to me that I hadn't
fried chicken in several years -- last time, I think, was a visit
from my brother -- so it felt a bit rarer than last year's yogurtlu
kebap and bisteeya. Besides, I had a copy of
Edna Lewis's
The Gift of Southern Cooking (with Scott Peacock) that
I bought in 2016 but still hadn't cooked anything from.
So this seemed like a good time to broaden my mother's backwoods
Arkansas background with a deeper survey of (mostly Afro-American)
Southern cooking. Once I made that decision, I ordered three more
cookbooks to broaden my perspective and cross-reference:
I also referred to several other cookbooks I already owned, most
importantly
The America's Test Kitchen Family Baking Book (my primary
source for baking except for cakes). I also thumbed through
Betty Fussell's I Hear America Cooking (my "go to" for
jambalaya). What I ultimately came up with was:
- Fried chicken, per Lewis: brined, buttermilk, cast iron, lard and
butter, dredge in flour and fry, making gravy from the drippings (no
recipe, but that's the way we always did it).
- Biscuits.
- Mashed potatoes, cooked in chicken stock, whipped up with butter
and cream, with shredded white sharp cheddar.
- Sweet potato casserole, topped with pecans, brown sugar, and a
flour-butter combo similar to pie crust.
- Greens in pork stock: collard, turnip, kale. I couldn't get the
"country ham" for the stock, so bought and roasted 4 lb. pork bones,
then simmered them and a chunk of salt pork for 10 hours.
- Maque choux: corn, onion, and green bell pepper, sauteed, then
added cream.
- Eggplant relish: roasted, with onion, tomato, and raisins.
- Apple chutney.
- Bacon jam.
I had planned on making green beans, but couldn't find them loose.
I bought a bag at Sprouts, but they tasted off when I boiled them,
so I threw them out. Also planned on making cornbread, but I got
rushed and confused and decided to just do the biscuits. I thought
the chutneys would go nice with the cornbread, but they wound up
getting left to the side (although they were all very good, as was
everything).
For dessert
I wanted to make the coconut cake and a pecan pie. Wound up making
two pies, both with ATK's all-butter crust. For one I used Lewis's
bourbon pecan pie filling, for the other ATK's chocolate pecan.
I also made the Fudgy Flourless Brownie Pie from the Black Girl
Baking book, with its tahini-maple sauce. I
posted a picture of the desserts on Facebook. My caption there:
"When I was growing up, I learned that dinner is just a social ritual
you have to get through in order to get to dessert."
With dinner plans afoot, I expected a drop in the number of records
reviewed this week, but the numbers held up pretty well. I knocked off
7 new jazz promos, another dozen-plus old unheard CDs, and a bunch of
unheard Christgau picks. I also picked up a copy of the new Nathan Bell
album
Christgau reviewed, and was impressed enough to go back to all his
other albums on Napster (where the new one isn't). First two were real
impressive, but I cooled a bit when he trimmed down to solo albums --
lots of good things in the songs, but not as much fun to listen to.
I've been hearing rhapsodic reports on the new Coltrane vault tape,
and I'm a huge fan of A Love Supreme, but I was disappointed when
I finally got a chance to hear it. Not inconceivable my opinion could
improve, but strikes me as a case of hope getting ahead of reality.
Thanks to the reader who tipped me to the "new" Kid Creole album.
Unfortunately, it's not really new, nor really good. Thanks to another
reader for catching some typos (one crippling), and for pointing out
the recent death of Dutch classical conductor/violinist
Bernard Haitink (also see
Bernard Haitink, Perhaps the Wisest Conductor of Them All).
I grew up despising classical music -- one prejudice I've never felt
the slightest desire of working on -- so I don't see myself following
up here, but seems like a public service announcement to note that
someone who likes most of what I like also holds this guy in highest
esteem.
I will note that
Mort Sahl died today, age 94 (also see:
Mort Sahl, Whose Biting Commentary Redefind Stand-Up, Dies at 94.)
I remember him as one of the first comics I heard who was really
outspoken on political issues. My favorite line of his goes something
like: "Charlton Hesston says he hopes his children will one day live
under Fascism. If he were more perceptive, he'd be a happy man today."
This is the last Music Week of October. I've opened a Streamnotes
file for November, and started to add new things to it (although I
liked A Rhys Chatham Compendium enough to sneak it in this
week). I haven't done the indexing for October yet, so will get to
it later this week. But as you can see from the link up top, it's
been a big month for sampling old music. Easy to keep doing that.
A good deal easier than figuring out what's new and interesting.
Not sure whether I'll do an EOY compilation this year. Early on I
would have said no, but not sure I'll be able to hold myself back.
New records reviewed this week:
- JD Allen: Queen City (2020 [2021], Savant): [r]: B+(*)
- Atmosphere: Word? (2021, Rhymesayers Entertainment): [r]: B+(*)
- Nathan Bell: Red, White and American Blues (It Couldn't Happen Here) (2021, Need to Know): [cd]: A
- Steven Bernstein's Millennial Territory Orchestra: Tinctures in Time (Community Music, Vol. 1) (2021, Royal Potato Family): [bc]: B+(***)
- Erin Enderlin: Barroom Mirrors EP (2021, Black Crow Productions, EP): [r]: B+(**)
- Adam Forkelid: 1st Movement (2021, Prophone): [cd]: B+(***)
- Jazz Daddies: Moontower Nights (2021, self-released): [cd]: B
- David Leon: Aire De Agua (2020 [2021], Out of Your Head): [cd]: B+(***)
- Lil Nas X: Montero (2021, Columbia): [r]: B+(*)
- Karen Marguth: Until (2014-21 [2021], OA2): [cd]: B+(*)
- John Moulder: Metamorphosis (2019 [2021], Origin): [cd]
- Randy Napoleon: Rust Belt Roots: Randy Napoleon Plays Wes Montgomery, Grand Green & Kenny Burrell (2018 [2021], OA2): [cd]: B+(**)
- RaeLynn: Baytown (2021, Round Here): [r]: B+(***)
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries:
- John Coltrane: A Love Supreme: Live in Seattle (1965 [2021], Impulse): [r]: B+(**)
- Kid Creole and the Coconuts: Nothin' Left but the Rest (1996 [2021], 2C2C): [r]: B+(**)
- Lionel Loueke: Close Your Eyes (2018 [2021], Sounderscore): [cd]: B+(***)
- Nadja Noordhuis: Gullfoss (2019 [2021], Little Mystery): [bc]: B+(*)
- Send I a Lion: A Nighthawk Reggae Joint (1979-84 [2019], Omnivore): [r]: B+(***)
- Billy Joe Shaver & Kinky Friedman: Live Down Under (2002 [2021], Omnivore): [r]: B+(**)
Old music:
- Nathan Bell: In Tune, On Time, Not Dead (2007, Zensuit): [r]: A-
- Nathan Bell: Traitorland (2008, Zensuit): [r]: A-
- Nathan Bell: Black Crow Blue (An American Album) (2011, Stone Barn): [r]: B+(**)
- Nathan Bell: Blood Like a River (2013, Stone Barn): [r]: B+(*)
- Nathan Bell: I Don't Do This for Love, I Do This for Love (Working and Hanging On in America) (2015, Stone Barn): [r]: B+(***)
- Nathan Bell: Love > Fear (48 Hours in Traitorland) (2017, Stone Barn): [r]: B+(***)
- Nathan Bell: Er Gwaetha Pawb a Phopeth (In Spite of Everyone and Everything) (2017 [2018], Angry Stick): [r]: B+(**)
- Nathan Bell: Loves Bones and Stars, Love's Bones and Stars (2018, Angry Stick): [r]: B+(***)
- Chris Berry and the Bayaka of Yandoumbe: Listen . . . OKA! (2011, Oka Productions): [r]: A-
- Calling Rastafari (1981 [1982], Nighthawk): [r]: B+(***)
- Rhys Chatham: A Rhys Chatham Compendium (1971-89 [2002], Table of the Elements): [cd]: A-
- The Ebony Hillbillies: Barefoot and Flying (2011, EH Music): [r]: B+(***)
- Maria Kalaniemi: Maria Kalaniemi (1992 [1994], Xenophile): [cd]: B+(**)
- Ustad Ali Akbar Khan/Pandit Swapan Chadhuri: Passing on the Tradition (1995 [1996], AMMP): [cd]: B+(*)
- Kodo: Ibuki (1997, Tristar): [cd]: B+(*)
- Look Directly Into the Sun: China Pop 2007 (2007, Bloodshot): [r]: B+(***)
- Masters of the Boogie Piano [Delmark 50th Anniversary Collection] (1939-2001 [2003], Delmark): [r]: B+(***)
- Pointer Sisters: Pointer Sisters' Greatest Hits (1978-81 [1982], RCA): [r]: B+(*)
- Pointer Sisters: Greatest Hits (1978-85 [1989], RCA): [r]: B+(**)
- The Ramones: Pleasant Dreams (1981, Sire): [r]: B+(***)
- The Rave-Ups: Town and Country (1985, Fun Stuff): [r]: B+(***)
- R.E.M.: New Adventures in Hi-Fi (1996, Warner Brothers): [r]: B+(***)
- The Replacements: Stink ("Kids Don't Follow Plus Seven) (1982, Twin/Tone, EP): [r]: B+(**)
- Jack Smith: Les Evening Gowns Damnées: 56 Ludlow Street 1962-1964 Volume I (1962-64 [1997], Table of the Elements): [cd]: B+(*)
- Jack Smith: Silent Shadows on Cinemaroc Island: 56 Ludlow Street 1962-1964 Volume II (1962-64 [1997], Table of Elements): [cd]: B
- The Sound of Kinshasa: Guitar Classics From Zaire (1950s-70s [1982], Original Music): [yt]: A-
- Streets of Dakar: Generation Boul Falé ([1999], Sterns): [r]: A-
- The Tanzania Sound (1960s [1987], Original Music): [yt]: A-
- A Taste of the Indestructible Beat of Soweto ([1993], Earthworks): [r]: A
- James Blood Ulmer: Black Rock (1982, Columbia): [yt]: A-
- Neil Young & the Bluenotes: This Note's for You (1988, Reprise): [r]: B-
- Neil Young & Crazy Horse: Weld (1991, Reprise, 2CD): [r]: A-
- Neil Young: Unplugged (1993, Reprise): [r]: B+(***)
- Neil Young & Crazy Horse: Broken Arrow (1996, Reprise): [r]: B+(**)
- Yuri Yunakov Ensemble: New Colors in Bulgarian Wedding Music (1997, Traditional Crossroads): [r]: B+(***)
- Z-Man: Dope or Dog Food (2004, Refill): [r]: B+(***)
- Tapper Zukie: Man Ah Warrior (1973 [1977], MER): [yt]: B+(***)
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Steve Coleman and Five Elements: Live at the Village Vanguard Volume II (MDW NTR) (Pi) [10-29]
Purchases:
- Nathan Bell: Red, White and American Blues (It Couldn't Happen Here) (Need to Know)
Wednesday, October 20, 2021
Daily Log
Colin Powell died, and is being mourned much more than he ever deserved.
I wrote this on Facebook:
My most indelible memory of Powell comes from his press conferences in
1990-91, where he repeatedly raised his voice to emphasize his
oft-repeated "kill the enemy" mantra. He clearly believed that killing
was the point of war, and was razor-focused on that. The "Powell
Doctrine" was designed to maximize killing, making it as one-sided as
possible. Neocons like Max Boot hated it because they wanted the US to
stop worrying about possible consequences of US interventions -- the
argument in Boot's "Savage Wars of Peace" is that we shouldn't worry
about getting into wars, because they always work out ok anyway. (He's
not the first prognosticator to go 0-for-forever after staking his
claim, nor the only one to remain employable.) You can't counter that
Powell's Doctrine was meant to keep us out of quagmire wars, because
he personally used it to define US wars in Panama and Kuwait/Iraq. The
Doctrine was shelved after 9/11, especially when the CIA war in
Afghanistan briefly looked successful. He probably had a role in
beefing up the Iraq invasion force beyond Rumsfeld's wishes, but the
effect of that was to abandon the real reason the 1990-91 wars looked
good: very limited goals. Wasn't Powell the guy behind the "Pottery
Barn Rule"? I can't find a redeemable moment in his career --
certainly not covering up war crimes in Vietnam, or launching them in
Central America, or in his political moves in 1993 to stop the
"Commander in Chief" from rectifying gross civil rights abuses under
his command. Maybe you can give him some credit for turning on Trump,
but so did his nemesis Boot. Now I read they want to rename some Army
base Fort Powell (as we're finally disposing of those bases named for
Confederate generals, the token black general looks
irresistible). What was it Thurgood Marshall said? "A black snake can
bite you as bad as a white snake." Powell may have been the first
black to attain various high posts, but he was never a pioneer or a
visionary. He rose through the ranks by being one of the boys,
committed to his comrades and their self-importance.
Laura also linked to this article from CodePink:
Colin Powell: Another War Criminal Cashes In.
Monday, October 18, 2021
Music Week
Expanded blog post,
October archive
(in progress).
Tweet: Music Week: 47 albums, 13 (or 14) A-list, mostly old
records (again), with some comments on method and madness. And yes,
I'm getting plenty mad.
Music: Current count 36480 [36433] rated (+47), 159 [188] unrated (-29).
Picked up a couple new (and one old) music tips from Robert Christgau's
Consumer Guide:
October 2021. I can note that I previously reviewed both Dave albums,
Homeboy Sandman's Anjelitu, and Kalie Shorr's I got Here by
Accident, all four at A-. Also Baloji at B+(***). While I had missed
this particular Howlin' Wolf edition, the same 20 songs are also available
in the same order on The Definitive Collection (released 2007),
previously
graded A+. It's depressing
to compare the pitiful one below to the one I wrote back then:
Howlin' Wolf: The Definitive Collection (1951-64 [2007],
Geffen/Chess): "Hidden Charms" was just a song, one about his girl.
Chester Burnett had nothing to hide except his name. He was a big man,
"three hundred pounds of heavenly joy," "built for comfort, not for
speed." And he was bold. His voice sounded like gravel, but he could
sing with it as well as bark, growl, and howl. He may not have been a
great guitarist, but Hubert Sumlin was -- when Buddy Guy joined the
band he played bass. Despite his mass, he had a light touch, an
uncanny rhythmic cadence that dropped the words gracefully into
place. Chess helped, too. Coming up from Memphis he was howlin' at
midnight; soon he was sittin' on top of the world. A+
Otherwise, last week was like the week before, except even more
depressing. Going through a sad, miserable patch, but at least I do
take a little pleasure in crossing previously unplayed CDs off my
"unrated" list -- at least as I cross them off my list, especially
ones I didn't much enjoy listening to. Still, two of those records
made the A-list this time (Ian Dury, Bert Williams). The other "old
music" records -- most of the ones not marked [cd] -- continued my
scan through the unheard Christgau-graded albums list, starting with
Eddie "Cleanhead" Vinson, up to Dwight Yoakam this week. Deep down
in the alphabet there, but still only 73% through (lot of various
artist compilations to follow). Also, I'm aware of a few records I
skipped that I can find on Napster or YouTube (shit I've really been
avoiding -- Robert Cray is the name I'm most conscious of, probably
because there's like three albums by him).
By the way, I don't seriously believe that anyone needs all three
Cleanhead A- albums this week. I think he's terrific, but damn little
difference between them, and any one will give you a good sample. (I
probably prefer Clean Head's Back in Town.) By the way, he's also
on two somewhat more varied records I'm also a fan of: Cleanhead and
Cannonball, as in Adderley, and Blues in the Night Volume 2: The
Late Show, filed under Etta James, and marginally better than
Volume 1: The Early Show.
I wound up showing covers of two albums not reviewed below. The
alternate Howlin' Wolf is really the same record, and when I looked
up the review (above), I found I already had the cover scan handy.
The Double Dee & Steinski EP didn't actually have a cover: it
was just a sleeve with the label showing through, not that you'd
ever find a copy anyway. The pictured Steinski comp starts off with
those three pieces, then adds two more hours of brilliance. It's a
desert island disc (well, two).
Reviewing old compilations always presents maddening, perhaps even
impossible, trade-off questions between multiple editions. When I
pointed out the Howlin' Wolf equivalence, Robert Christgau left his
review unchanged, but
tweeted:
To spare myself an insane amount of discographical nitpicking, I chose
to base this week's Howlin' Wolf pick solely on what was in my shelves.
But note that indefatigably punctilious Tom Hull has determined that
Chess's 2007 Wolf Definitive Collection is identical to
His Best.
Punctilious as I am, I also work mostly from my own shelves, plus
a few things that are readily streamable. So sometimes I pull obsolete
(out-of-print) compilations off my shelf. Since I've been checking up
on old Christgau grades, I look for the releases he reviewed, even if
they are long out-of-print, superseded by more recent editions -- even
if that requires assembling an approximate playlist. That doesn't seem
like ideal consumer guidance, but some kind of compromise is necessary.
One odd artifact this week is that I've ignored the 2004 release dates
on my Jethro Tull reissues in favor of their original dates, since that
seems like a better baseline. I own a copy of A + Slipstream, but
since the latter is just a live DVD, I limited the review to A.
On the other hand, it's possible that on occasion I devalue an old LP
compilation in favor of later CDs. That's likely with Don Williams
below, as I at least partly explain in the review.
The Ezz-Thetics reissues continue to bug me. After I reviewed four
a couple weeks ago, a reader pointed out that the series is curated
with great care, with detailed liner notes from reputable critics. I
review two more below, and find them slightly more useful than the
original releases. I will get to more later.
I had to make my own scan of the Bert Williams, a release that seems
to have escaped notice on the Internet.
Archeophone's three volumes are probably the preferred source, not
least for sound quality, but my single disc fills the bill nicely. I
didn't write it as such, but that final trio of A-list albums (Williams,
Betty Wright, Yo Yo) says much about the trajectory of race in America
(and you can fill in a few gaps with Wynonie Harris, Howlin' Wolf,
Cleanhead Vinson, and Marion Brown. Bought a new HP all-in-one printer
in hopes of doing some scanning with it, but hadn't tried it, and it
turned out xsane couldn't work with it. Very unhappy about that, and
I blame HP -- for business tactics I hitherto mostly associated with
Apple.
Started reading
Kim Stanley Robinson's The Ministry for the
Future -- the first novel I've tackled in close to 20 years.
I've long said that when I finally get so disgusted with the world
I give up, I'm going to give up and switch to fiction. I'm not sure
if that's what this signals. For one thing, it's been touted as a
superb wonk book. I've been writing a bit on annotation for a KSR
article in Financial Times (paywalled, but I secured a samizdat
copy). I'm despairing of getting it into publishable shape, but
we're not so very far apart: he's both more pessimistic (maybe I
mean panicky) and more optimistic (a faith in geoengineering I'm
not convinced of), but we share common ground in believing that
survival depends on fundamental changes in attitudes and beliefs,
especially toward each other.
That would be difficult in any case, but the degree of stupidity
and vileness exhibited lately on the US right is mind boggling. I
haven't written a
Speaking of Which
in nearly a month in large part because words seem so insufficient.
Another problem, by the way, is that my sources have been drying up,
increasingly blockaded by paywalls. Latest seems to be Politico. I've
never put much stock in them, but occasionally issues are so obvious
they break through their studied bipartisanship. I don't see how an
informed electorate is possible when everything's pay-to-play.
This week is countdown to my 71st birthday. I usually make a big
dinner, and a month ago was looking forward to this one. As of today,
I have no fucking idea what I'm going to do. (Well, the minimum is
probably
cake.) Have some other projects around the house to work on, so
might be a good time to take a break from the usual grind.
New records reviewed this week:
- Thomas Anderson: Ladies and Germs (2021, Out There): [r]: A-
- Mickey Guyton: Remember My Name (2021, Capitol): [r]: B+(***)
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries:
- Albert Ayler Quintet: 1966: Berlin, Lorrach, Paris & Stockholm. Revisited (1966 [2021], Ezz-Thetics, 2CD): [bc]: B+(***)
- Marion Brown: Capricorn Moon to Juba Lee Revisited (1965-66 [2019], Ezz-Thetics): [bc]: A-
Old music:
- Keola Beamer: Wooden Boat (1994, Dancing Cat): [cd]: B+(*)
- Bingo: Songs for Children in English With Brazilian and Caribbean Rhythms (2005, Soundbrush): [cd]: B+(*)
- The Contemporary Piano Ensemble: The Key Players (1993, DIW/Columbia): [cd]: B+(**)
- Don Dixon: Chi-Town Budget Show (1988, Restless): [cd]: B+(*)
- Double Dee & Steinski: The Payoff Mix/Lesson Two/Lesson 3 (1985, Tommy Boy, EP): [r]: A
- Ian Dury & the Blockheads: Live! All the Best, Mate (1990 [2000], Music Club): [cd]: A-
- Shirley Eikhard: The Last Hurrah (2000, Shirley Eikhard Music): [cd]: B+(**)
- Shirley Eikhard: End of the Day (2001, Shirley Eikhard Music): [cd]: B+(*)
- Shirley Eikhard: Stay Open (2002-03 [2003], Shirley Eikhard Music): [cd]: B+(***)
- Dan Fogelberg: The Essential Dan Fogelberg (1973-90 [2003], Epic/Legacy): [cd]: C+
- Forgetting Sarah Marshall [Original Motion Picture Soundtrack] ([2008], Verve Forecast): [cd]: B
- Gimme Indie Rock V. 1 (1984-99 [2000], K-Tel, 2CD): [cd]: B+(*)
- The Golden Gate Quartet: Travelin' Shoes (1937-39 [1992], Bluebird/RCA): [cd]: B+(***)
- Barry Harris: Live at Maybeck Recital Hall Volume Twelve (1990 [1991], Concord): [cd]: B+(**)
- Wynonie Harris: Rockin' the Blues (1944-50 [2001], Proper, 4CD): [cd]: A-
- Tish Hinojosa: Dreaming of the Labyrinth/Soñar del Laberinto (1996, Warner Brothers): [cd]: B+(***)
- Robin Holcomb: Robin Holcomb (1990, Elektra): [cd]: B+(*)
- Howlin' Wolf: His Best (1951-64 [1997], MCA/Chess): [r]: A+
- Ella Jenkins: Little Johnny Brown (1971 [2001], Smithsonian/Folkways): [cd]: B+(***)
- Jethro Tull: Live: Busting Out (1978 [2004], Chrysalis, 2CD): [cd]: B-
- Jethro Tull: Stormwatch (1979, Chrysalis): [cd]: C+
- Jethro Tull: A (1980, Chrysalis): [cd]: C+
- George Jones: The Definitive Collection 1955-1962 (1955-62 [2004], Mercury/Chronicles): [r]: A
- Kartet: The Bay Window (2006 [2007], Songlines): [cd]: B+(***)
- Alan Morse: Four O'Clock and Hysteria (2007, Inside Out Music): [cd]: B
- Genesis P-Orridge & Astrid Monroe: When I Was Young (2001 [2004], Important): [cd]: B+(**)
- Mike Rizzo: Webster Hall's New York Dance CD v.6 (2003, Webster Hall NYC): [cd]: B+(**)
- Daryl Stuermer: Go (2007, Inside Out Music): [cdr]: B-
- Swans: Soundtracks for the Blind (1996, Young God/Atavistic, 2CD): [cd]: B
- UTD [Urban Thermo Dynamics: DCQ/Ces/Mos Def]: Manifest Destiny (2004, Illson Media): [yt]: B+(***)
- Eddie 'Cleanhead' Vinson: Clean Head's Back in Town (1957, Bethlehem): [r]: A-
- Eddie 'Cleanhead' Vinson: The Original Cleanhead (1970, BluesTime): [r]: A-
- Eddie "Cleanhead" Vinson: Kidney Stew [The Definitive Black & Blue Sessions] (1969-78 [1996], Black & Blue): [r]: A-
- Bert Williams: "It's Getting So You Can't Trust Nobody": The Songs of Bert Williams Volume One (1901-22 [199X], Vaudeville Archive): [cd]: A-
- Don Williams: The Best of Don Williams, Volume II (1975-78 [1979], MCA): [r]: B+(***)
- Bobby Womack: Greatest Hits (1972-89 [1999], Capitol): [cd]: B+(*)
- Stevie Wonder: Original Musiquarium I (1971-82 [1982], Motown, 2CD): [r]: B+(***)
- Stevie Wonder: In Square Circle (1985, Tamla): [r]: B+(***)
- Stevie Wonder: Jungle Fever (1991, Motown): [r]: B+(**)
- Betty Wright: Danger High Voltage (1974, Alston): [r]: A-
- Betty Wright: Live (1978, Alston): [r]: B+(***)
- Yo Yo: You Better Ask Somebody (1993, EastWest): [yt]: A-
- Dwight Yoakam: Just Lookin' for a Hit (1986-89 [1989], Reprise): [r]: B+(***)
Records I played parts of, but not enough to grade:
-- means no interest, - not bad but not a prospect,
+ some chance, ++ likely prospect.
- Henry Threadgill Zooid: Poof (2021, Pi): [r]: [2/5]: +
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- David Leon: Aire De Agua (Out of Your Head) [08-27]
Daily Log
Saw this meme on Facebook:
The price of gasoline consists of four factors: taxes, distribution and
marketing, the cost of refining, and crude oil prices -- which are not
determined by the president.
Joni Bradley added: "Let us quit blaming Biden for all kinds of
things." I suppose if I really thought about it, I could find something
to fault Biden for, but reading the crap spewed out by Republicans, I
simply don't feel like it. Still, the meme failed to understand many
basic tenets of business and economics, so I took a stab at correcting
the record:
The price of gasoline is determined by demand and supply. When supply
is constricted (by OPEC quotas, by wars and sanctions, by hurricanes
and other disasters, by depletion of existing fields, by
transportation snafus as seems to be the case in the UK recently),
prices rise. When demand drops (most dramatically by recessions, but
longer-term by the switch to electric cars), prices drop. Your first
three cost factors are relatively fixed (although taxes vary a lot by
region; Europe has taxed gasoline heavily at least since the 1950s,
which is why European cars have always been much more fuel-efficient
than American cars), so price volatility gets pushed back to crude oil
prices (which is where the real windfall profits reside). Politicians
can affect both supply and demand sides, but mostly indirectly. (There
are some exceptions, such as filling up and drawing down the US
Strategic Reserve. Taxes is another way in theory, but aside from
California there have been no significant tax changes in decades.)
Bush and Trump drove gasoline prices up through wars and sanctions
(Trump less so because under Obama the US became a net exporter for
the first time since 1969, and because demand was already slacking),
only to see prices collapse when both ended in major
recessions. Gasoline prices have been rising under Biden because the
economy is recovering. That's actually good news. And while recovery
was likely to happen in any case, having a sane and responsible person
as president must be counted a plus.
Many more tangents on this I could have wandered off on.
Monday, October 11, 2021
Music Week
Expanded blog post,
October archive
(in progress).
Tweet: Music Week: 63 albums, 9 A-list, hardly anything new
this week, just lots of old stuff, including CDs I bought 20 years
ago and am only now getting to (some are actually pretty good).
Music: Current count 36433 [36370] rated (+63), 188 [203] unrated (-15).
Almost no new jazz (or new anything else) this week. I continued
with the Christgau unheard list, moving from B.B. King to Merle Travis,
although I couldn't find most of the A-list records in the bottom half
of that list. (This is my second pass, and while I skipped a lot of A-N
albums in the first pass, I had made a more diligent effort further
down.) Note that 4 of this week's A-list items are albums I didn't buy
because I had previously heard/rated most of the music from other editions
(Fela, Lovin' Spoonful, Roy Orbison, Merle Travis). I've noted some of
those other editions below.
The other thing I did last week was to rifle through a shelf unit
which (at least originally) had old CDs from my unheard list, and
played what looks like a random selection. I had bought a ton of CDs
early in the 2000s, especially in "going out of business" sales, and
many of them languished. I've been keeping track of "unheard albums"
since 2003, when the total was over 900. Eventually I got it down to
the low 200s, but as I've streamed more, I've scrounged less, and I
was getting frustrated at my inability to drop the unrated number
below 200. Well, I made a dent in that list this week. To my surprise,
three of those albums made this week's A-list, in very different ways
(folksinger Ewan MacColl, Mardi Gras Party, and a hip-hop mix).
The remaining unrated albums are
listed here. Where they are in
the house is anyone's guess, but I figure this is at least in part a
housekeeping task.
One excuse I have is that the new promo queue has shrunk to the
point where I only have one album past its release date (and that
was one I received last week, by a group I had never heard of).
That doesn't count downloads, which I don't keep very good track
of. Actually got a fair amount of unpacking last week, mostly into
November. I'll do them when I get around to it. Things are pretty
messy right now.
Wichita suffered a catastrophe last week: the city water system
broke down, leading to a "boil water alert." The pumps were shut
down by an electrical failure. Then when they started up again,
the restored pressure broke a 42-inch main a couple miles east of
us, flooding streets and dropping pressure again. We spent a few
days working around the various restrictions and warnings, thinking
about how critical it is to have a safe, reliable source of water.
And contemplating how callous and stupid Republicans (and a couple
Democrats) are in their opposition to sorely needed infrastructure
investments.
Wichita (and most of Kansas) set a record high temperature on
Saturday. I've set up a fairly fancy weather station here, so we're
keeping a close watch. Got 1.55 inches of rain yesterday. We've
generally been pretty lucky this year: hot but not exceptionally so,
a bit drier than usual but not quite enough to call it a drought,
and the jet stream has been well to the north, so we haven't seen
much smoke from the fires out west.
New records reviewed this week:
- Jü: III (2021, RareNoise): [cd]: B+(*)
- Jo Berger Myhre: Unheimlich Manoeuvre (2021, RareNoise): [cdr]: B+(**)
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries:
- Nick Lowe and Los Straitjackets: Walkabout (2013-19 [2020], Yep Roc): [r]: B
Old music:
- Fela and Afrika 70: Zombie (1976 [1977], M.I.L. Multimedia): [r]: A-
- Hard Times Come Again No More, Vol. 1: Early American Rural Songs of Hard Times and Hardships (1924-37 [1998], Yazoo): [r]: A-
- B.B. King: The Best of B.B. King (1969-71 [1973], ABC): [yt]: B+(***)
- B.B. King: The Best of B.B. King (1967-85 [1999], MCA): [r]: B+(***)
- B.B. King: Blues Summit (1993, MCA): [r]: B+(***)
- B.B. King: His Definitive Greatest Hits (1963-93 [1999], Polygram): [r]: A-
- B.B. King: Deuces Wild (1997, MCA): [r]: B+(***)
- B.B. King: Let the Good Times Roll: The Music of Louis Jordan (1999, Geffen): [r]: B+(**)
- Ali Hassan Kuban: From Nubia to Cairo (1980 [1989], Piranha): [r]: B+(***)
- Fela Ransome Kuti and His Koola Lobitos: Highlife Jazz and Afro-Soul (1963-1969) (1963-69 [2016], Knitting Factory, 3CD): [r]: B+(***)
- Lady Saw: Passion (1997, VP): [r]: B+(*)
- Ladysmith Black Mambazo: The Best of Ladysmith Black Mambazo (1975-85 [1992], Shanachie): [r]: B+(***)
- Ladysmith Black Mambazo: The Gift of the Tortoise (1994, Music for Little People): [cd]: B+(*)
- Tony Lakatos/Al Foster/Kirk Lightsey/George Mraz: The News (1994 [1995], Jazzline): [cd]: B+(**)
- Jim Lauderdale: Pretty Close to the Truth (1994, Atlantic): [cd]: B+(*)
- Linx: Intuition (1981, Chrysalis): [r]: B+(**)
- Living Things: Ahead of the Lions (2004 [2005], Jive/Zomba): [r]: B+(***)
- Love: Da Capo (1967, Elektra): [r]: B+(***)
- Love: Four Sail (1969, Elektra): [r]: B+(**)
- Love: Out There (1969, Blue Thumb): [r]: B-
- Love: False Start (1970, Blue Thumb): [r]: B+(**)
- The Lovin' Spoonful: Greatest Hits (1965-68 [2000], Buddha): [r]: A-
- Nick Lowe and His Cowboy Outfit: The Rose of England (1985, Columbia): [r]: B+(***)
- Nick Lowe: Untouched Takeaway (1995-2000 [2004], Yep Roc): [r]: B
- Luna: Slide (1993, Elektra, EP): [r]: B+(***)
- Lynyrd Skynyrd: Nuthin' Fancy (1975, MCA): [r]: B+(**)
- Lynyrd Skynyrd: Gimme Back My Bullets (1976, MCA): [r]: B+(*)
- Lynyrd Skynyrd: One More From the Road (1976, MCA): [r]: B+(**)
- Lynyrd Skynyrd: Street Survivors (1977, MCA): [r]: B+(***)
- Lynyrd Skynyrd: Gold & Platinum (1972-77 [1979], MCA, 2CD): [r]: B+(***)
- Yo-Yo Ma: Classic Yo-Yo (1992-2001 [2001], Sony Classical): [r]: B+(*)
- Ewan MacColl: Black and White: The Definitive Collection (1972-86 [1990], Green Linnet): [cd]: A-
- Mardi Gras Party (1971-90 [1991], Rounder): [cd]: A-
- The Master Musicians of Jajouka Featuring Bachir Attar: Apocalypse Across the Sky (1992, Axiom): [r]: B+(***)
- Johnny Mathis: The Ultimate Hits Collection (1956-86 [1998], Columbia): [r]: B+(**)
- Moby Grape: Moby Grape (1967, Columbia): [yt]: B+(**)
- Moby Grape: Wow (1968, Columbia): [yt]: C+
- Moby Grape: Moby Grape '69 (1969, Columbia): [yt]: B-
- M.O.P.: Handle Ur Bizness (1997, Relativity): [cd]: B+(*)
- Bill Morrissey: North (1986, Philo): [r]: B+(*)
- Bill Morrissey: Bill Morrissey (1991, Philo): [r]: B+(*)
- Bill Morrissey & Greg Brown: Friend of Mind (1993, Philo): [r]: B+(**)
- Pablo Moses: I Love I Bring (1975 [1978], United Artists): [yt]: B+(***)
- Motörhead: No Remorse (1979-84 [1984], Bronze): [r]: B+(***)
- The Walter Norris Quartet: Sunburst (1991, Concord): [cd]: B+(***)
- Roy Orbison: 16 Biggest Hits (1960-64 [1999], Monument/Legacy): [r]: A
- Annette Peacock: I Have No Feelings (1986, Ironic): [yt]: B-
- Annette Peacock: An Acrobat's Heart (2000, ECM): [r]: B
- Ken Peplowski: The Other Portrait (1996, Concord): [cd]: B
- Ralph Peterson Quintet: Art (1992 [1994], Blue Note): [cd]: B+(*)
- Prodigy Present: The Dirtchamber Sessions: Volume One (1998 [1999], XL): [cd]: A-
- Dr. Krishna Raghavendra: RARE Pulse (2001, GEMA): [cd]: B+(*)
- Remember Shakti [John McLaughlin/Zakir Hussain/U. Shrinivas/V. Selvaganesh]: The Believer (1999 [2000], Verve): [cd]: B+(**)
- Remember Shakti: Saturday Night in Bombay (2000 [2001], Verve): [cd]: B+(**)
- Jimmy Rogers: The Complete Chess Recordings (1950-59 [1997], MCA, 2CD): [cd]: B+(**)
- Nate Ruth: Whatever It Meant (2002, Soundless): [cd]: B
- Jeremy Steig/Eddie Gomez: Outlaws (1976 [1977], Enja): [cd]: B+(***)
- Swayzak: Himawari (2000, Medicine): [cd]: B+(***)
- Swayzak: Dirty Dancing (2002, !K7): [cd]: B+(**)
- Train Don't Leave Me: Recorded Live at the 1st Annual Sacred Steel Convention (2000 [2001], Arhoolie): [cd]: B+(**)
- Merle Travis: Sweet Temptation: The Best of Merle Travis (1946-1953) (1946-53 [2000], Razor & Tie): [r]: A-
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Sylvie Courvoisier/Mary Halvorson: Searching for the Disappeared Hour (Pyroclastic) [10-29]
- Adam Forkelid: 1st Movement (Prophone) [10-09]
- Jazz Daddies: Moontower Nights (self-released) [09-06]
- Karen Marguth: Until (OA2) [10-15]
- Cameron Mizell & Charlie Rauh: Local Folklore (Destiny) [10-29]
- John Moulder: Metamorphosis (Origin) [10-15]
- Randy Napoleon: Rust Belt Roots: Randy Napoleon Plays Wes Montgomery, Grand Green & Kenny Burrell (OA2) [10-15]
- Jacob Schulman: Connectedness (Endectomorph Music) [11-14]
Sunday, October 10, 2021
Daily Log
Robert Christgau, in
his review of Kim Stanley Robinson's novel, The Ministry for
the Future, refers to an essay by KSR published in Financial
Times. The piece is behind a severe paywall, but I wangled a copy,
and thought I would offer a partial annotation (which should be fair
use). It reads more like lecture notes than an essay. I thought I'd
pull some quotes (in bold below) out, then add my comments.
What does it feel like to live on the brink of a vast historical
change? It feels like now.
We've been living in the midst of vast historical change for about
150 years now, so you'd think we'd be getting used to it by now. The
main developments are technological. Starting around 1870, accelerating
dramatically around 1900, and more sporadically every 20-30 years since,
the main innovations were:
- Oil, a vast and portable store of energy, which made it possible
for people to do previously unimagined quantities of work (something
we're constantly reminded of as we measure engines in horsepower).
- Electricity, a form of energy which can be transmitted instantly,
and controlled and focused in infinitesimal amounts.
- Materials, especially metals, which can be extracted, refined,
and machined precisely, and plastics, which can also be built to
extraordinary precision.
- Information, which can be collected at a mind-bogglingly vast
level, stored indefinitely, and transferred instantly anywhere.
The effect of these technological changes is that today, unlike
150 years ago, we live in a wholly synthetic world, a bubble of
human design, which has given most of us longer, healthier, more
comfortable, and better entertained lives than was imaginable just
a few generations before. One simple measure of this change is that
the number of human beings the Earth can support has increased in
this period sixfold (from 1.276 billion in 1870 to 7.753 billion
in 2020).
The only comparable degree of change in human history started
about 10,000 years ago with agriculture, as humans managed to
domesticate a few plants and animals, dedicating land to their
cultivation, building water works to nurture them, markets for
trade, and armies to defend from marauders (or do some plundering
on their own). But that played out over thousands of years: high
estimates for world population 10,000 years ago were 5-10 million,
growing to 28 million 6,000 years ago (when the first "cradles of
civilization" were evident), 72 million 4,000 years ago (with the
growth of small regional empires), 188 million 2,000 years ago
(with large empires in China and the Mediterranean), 295 million
1,000 years ago, and 461 million 500 years ago (the start of the
European conquest).
So, pace KSR, the "vast historical change" has already
happened, quite recently and suddenly. The sense that we are "on
the brink" may still be real. Great changes are mixed blessings,
and it is reasonable to worry that we have not properly accounted
for the risks and potential downfalls of the last 150's years of
blinding progress. Climate change is the worry on KSR's mind, but
it's not the only one.
The first great change (to agriculture) forced humans to adjust
in many ways, which took time and was often painful, but happened
so long ago we can hardly imagine what life was like as scattered
primitive hunter-gatherers. Many of the adjustments dealt with
interpersonal relations, which were largely codified through the
development of religions (occurring in parallel in the various
"cradles of civilization," mostly in the first millennium BCE),
and later through civil codes. But there were also ecological
crises, ranging from mass extinctions and loss of biodiversity
to irrigation failures, plagues, and climate-related crises.
One thing we should have learned from history is that humans
are quick to accept the gifts of progress, reluctant to anticipate
downsides and side-effects, blind to catastrophic long-term trends,
and stubbornly resistant to change (especially to their privileged
sense of social order). While the last 150 years of technological
progress has profoundly affected virtually everyone, adjustment has
proceeded slowly, fitfully if at all. Indeed, we are often stuck
trying to understan new information through ideological concepts
from earlier eras.
One thing I will note here is that this 150-year spurt of incredible
technological progress was built on top of an intellectual revolution
that goes back 500 years, past the Enlightenment to the Renaissance,
with the rise of secular thought, science, rationality, free speech,
civil law, and an economic system which distributed decision-making,
allowing self-motivated entrepreneurs to competitively maximize their
commercialization of new technologies. The latter has downsides we've
been slow to recognize, like putting short-term profits over long-term
concerns, increasing inequality, and capturing political power for the
protection of its privileged owners.
Humanity now stands on the brink of not just change, but
disaster. And because we can see it coming, just as clear as a black
storm on the horizon, our attempts to dodge disaster and create a
healthy relationship with our only home will bring huge changes in our
habits, laws, institutions and technologies. . . . Unlike the people
living in the years before the first world war, we won't be sandbagged
by catastrophe. The 2020s will not be filled with surprises -- except
perhaps at the speed and intensity of the changes coming down. With
its atmosphere of dread foreboding, our time more resembles the years
preceding the second world war, when everyone lived with a sensation
of helplessly sliding down a slippery slope and over a cliff.
Two big topics here. One is the extent to which we understand the
coming crisis. The other is how painful those "huge changes in our
habits, laws, institutions and technologies" -- indeed, what pains
we're willing to accept, either to change or by resisting change.
It certainly is the case that some people understand the way the
world works, including the way humans function on Earth, much better
now than ever before -- although in this age of specialization, even
very smart people have serious blind spots. Still, I wonder whether
alarmists (like KSR) focus on climate change not because it's the
biggest issue we're facing but because it's so clear and simple --
hence relatively easy to grasp (which, of course, makes one wonder
all the more about the deniers). I don't wish to detract from the
importance of climate change as an issue, but it's possible that
there are other more/less equally important issues, some of which
are being neglected because they don't kick you in the teeth like
a hurricane, drought, floods, or massive fires.
I also suspect that one reason a lot of people are so concerned
about climate change isn't that they understand the science, but
instead have this deep-seated romantic notion that pristine nature
is perfect (those so inclined would say: "the way God intended").
Recent (as geologists use the term, which is to say for most of the
last 18,000 years) climate is one of many the Earth has supported,
with others equally viable. Life adapts, and humans are considerably
more adpatable than most. So I hate it when I hear people talk about
"saving the Earth": it's a reflection of their own self-importance
to think that the Earth needs their help; rather, the dire need is
to save our peculiar perch on the Earth, not because we cannot adapt
to a radically changed Earth -- indeed, we have already changed its
surface extensively to suit our purposes -- but because the costs
of adaptation are painfully high. This is basically because the
synthetic world we've constructed is much more fragile than the
natural world we originally evolved into, and because we've stressed
that synthetic world by expanding our population to the limits of
its carrying capacity.
The second topic can be illustrated by a model. Let's say, we
have to negotiate a turn to get from point A to point B. We need
to figure out how sharply we can turn, and how fast. The problem
is that we have a lot of inertia to overcome: physical, economic,
and psychological. That inertia is why even political figures who
are committed to the idea of stopping the rise in carbon dioxide
levels so often talk about goals for 2030 or 2050 or further out.
When KSR talks about changing technologies, he's hoping scientists
and engineers will come up with a painless cure, something that
will suck the excess heat out of the air.
It's completely unrealistic to think we can ignore that inertia
and just suddenly, arbitrarily solve the greenhouse gas problem.
On the other hand, if we try to make the change of direction slow
and painless, we'll never get to where we need to be. Political
systems try to balance off private and public interest groups, but
in the right has long disparaged the very idea of a public interest,
and the American political system has long been dominated by money
interests, especially business (and especially oil).
But historical analogies will take us only so far in
understanding our current situation, since we have never before been
able to wreck our own means of existence.
That really started with the proliferation of nuclear weapons,
but that threat was more tangible because they blow up so spectacularly,
and more manageable because the number of people with their fingers on
the triggers has always been so small. It would be simple to free us
from that threat, and it is stupid that we haven't done so. Climate
change is harder to visualize, because it works slowly, methodically,
via the accumulation of many small, individually innocuous acts. Even
so, many people have learned to reflexively blame global warming for
increasingly frequent and disastrous weather effects, so the issue
is rapidly gaining immediacy -- even if few currently see it as an
existential threat.
Scientists coined the name the Anthropocene to signal that this
moment in history is unprecedented. There are so many of us, and our
technologies are so powerful, and our social systems so heedless of
consequences, that our damage to Earth's biosphere has increased with
stunning speed.
Until recently, the term anthropocene had a whiff of hubris to it,
the suggestion of man's God-given dominion over the Earth. However,
the term has quickly spread, signifying not just humanity's effects
on the biosphere, but on geostratigraphy itself. If humans were soon
wiped off the face of the earth, intelligent visitors would have no
trouble identifying the Anthropocene layer in the rocks ("possible
markers include microplastics, heavy metals, or the radioactive
nuclei left by tests from thermonuclear weapons" -- distinctions
which delineate the last 75 years from the rest of the Holocene,
hence KSR's "stunning speed").
By the way, what I've been referring to as inertia KSR describes as
"immense biological and geophysical momentum." He notes that: "We can't
just gather our diplomats and call it off, declare peace with the
biosphere." (But we could do that with nuclear weapons. The stumbling
block is that key political leaders don't even have that modicum of
vision and will.)
Supply chains that we rely on for life itself can be disrupted by
hoarding, which is to say by loss of trust in our systems. In the US,
it was toilet paper and cleaning supplies -- but if it had been food,
then boom: panic, breakdown, famine, the war of all against
all. That's how fragile civilisation is; that's how much individuals
are forced to trust each other to survive. A prisoner's dilemma
indeed, all of us locked together on this one planet. We either hang
together or we hang separately: Franklin's law.
Few people had given any thought to supply chains before the pandemic,
but the economy crashed on the front edge of the pandemic in 2020 not
because lots of people were getting sick, but because early lockdowns
broke supply chains, a failure that propagated throughout the world
economy faster than the virus did. I'm not especially prescient on
these things, but I remember a few years ago an earthquake in Taiwan
closed down an industrial park which housed all three of the companies
worldwide that made a critical electrical component. Supply chain risk
has gotten markedly worse in recent years, as factories have squeezed
out extra profits from "just-in-time" parts delivery, and also because
the search for bargains has driven less efficient suppliers out of
markets, leading to further concentration.
That's only a part of what KSR is getting at, but it's a particularly
vivid example of how the relentless search for efficiency, which is driven
by demand for higher returns to capital, increases risk and fragility.
While I agree that loss of trust is a paramount issue of our times, the
problem with supply chains is that we don't distrust suppliers as much as
we should (because we're not good at evaluating risk, especially when
myopia promises profits).
Another lesson from the pandemic, one we should have known
already: science is powerful. We need to learn to put it to better use
than we do, but if we were to do that, lots of good things would
follow. Aiming science is the work of the humanities and arts,
politics and law. We have to decide as a civilisation what tasks are
most important for us to take on now.
It's tempting to say: "science got us into this mess, so how can we
look to more science to find a way out?" Wouldn't backing up be more
prudent? But in simple terms, that would mean forcing 8 billion people
to revert to a world that was hard-pressed feeding 1 billion. And food
is just one of many blessings of 150 years of staggering technological
progress we'd be unwilling to give up -- that we'd be willing to fight
and kill each other to protect. So, sure, we have to plow on through,
but we can't do it the same ways we've done it in the past. We need to
understand that letting the profit motive dictate what gets done, what
is available, and to whom, has warped everything with its perverse
incentives. And where we can't directly limit the bad side-effects,
we need to rig incentives differently.
Most of the rest of KSR's essay is dedicated to tinkering with
incentives, but he remains locked in certain conventional ways of
thinking.
Monday, October 04, 2021
Music Week
Expanded blog post,
October archive
(in progress).
Tweet: Music Week: 47 albums, 10 A-list, 4/18 new music, 1/4 new
compilation, 5/25 old albums (3/7 by Jimi Hendrix), an active week of
diving deep into divers artists and niches, plus some thoughts on
singles lists, science fiction, the approaching apocalypse.
Music: Current count 36370 [36323] rated (+47), 203 [207] unrated (-4).
Spent much of the week whittling down the unheard Christgau list,
this week starting at Grateful Dead and working my way to Jaojoby
(B.B. King next, playing now). Took a couple side trips along the
way. I was excited to hear that Hat Hut's Ezz-Thetics reissue label
has a
Bandcamp page, then
chagrined to find that many of their "Revisited" sets were purloined
from other labels (probably aided by Europe's 50-year copyright limit).
Hat was an important label for new jazz from the early 1970s on, so
they have a lot of important music in their vaults, but they've always
had certain business quirks. Another diversion was Michaelangelo Matos
publishing a 2021 top-ten ballot on Facebook, so I checked out the half
I hadn't heard (or for that matter heard of). The Matos list also led
me to find a couple Burnt Sugar albums I had missed.
My other big diversion (a/k/a waste of time) this week was to play
around with singles lists. What I have so far is tucked away in the
notebook, but I'll probably move it into a standalone file if I ever
get it close to presentable. (Temporary link
here, but this is very short
of ready, and also the numbers are for counting, not rank -- each list
is alphabetical by artist.)
My methodology was to start by looking at the Rolling Stone list (via
Rock NYC and the
ballots by Robert Christgau and Carola Dibbell and
Chuck Eddy, and pick out what seemed most indubitable. Then I started
looking through my
database to find various artists
compilations I liked. I would then pull them up on Discogs or Wikipedia
for song lists, and pick a few more titles from them. Once I decided I
wanted something from an artists, I would go on to Wikipedia to look
at artist discographies (especially singles, which are usually presented
with chart numbers).
Two insights occurred after I got started: (1) I decided to break up
the list by decades, otherwise comparisons became difficult (too many
apples-to-oranges) and would ultimately just prove my period prejudice:
as someone born in 1950, the 1960s and 1970s were my peak exploration
period, where everything was new and much of it exciting. I've continued
to follow (and enjoy) new music since then, but after I stopped writing
rockcrit in 1980 (and listening to radio a few years earlier, and stopped
buying singles) I thought about it differently. If I tried to balance out
a life-spanning singles list, it would wind up being about 80% pre-1980
(and 60% pre-1970), which says something about singles vs. albums -- the
latter really came into their own around 1967-70 -- but mostly that I'm
just an old fart. (2) is that after starting to pick one song per artist
(per decade), I decided it would be worthwhile to add a few alternatives --
in case I wanted to refine my choices later on, or simply because some
songs were too good to omit, and I started to get greedy.
I initially decided to leave jazz out completely -- no disrespect,
but they became different things, with different aims, about the time
LPs split off from singles in the 1950s. I may revise this to make vocals
the dividing line. That would leave some rock instrumentals out, but not
many were ever likely to be considered ("Rebel Rouser"? "Pipeline"?
"Honky Tonk"?) And post-1970 I've picked the occasional album-only track
(I think the first one I jotted down was Mott the Hoople's "I Wish I Was
Your Mother"). I'm doing this almost exclusively from a memory that
since the late 1970s has almost exclusively been formed from listening
to albums, so it's no surprise that many of the songs that stuck in my
cerebellum like singles used to were never marketed as such. (Note that
not every critic has experienced this the way I have: in the late 1970s
12-inch singles became favored by DJs; in the 1980s MTV started the
flood of video singles; and from the late 1990s the Internet has done
much more to break singles than radio, which for all I know is nothing
but senseless blather these days. Younger critics started with these
media, much as I started with AM radio.)
So far I mostly have records from 1955-70, not just because that's
my prime period, but also because that's where I've looked most
intensively. I'm starting to think the 1960s and 1970s need to be
broken into two halves, both due to quantity but also due to the rapid
rate of change in those two decades, with 1964 and 1976 especially
pivotal dates. As I recall, the first halves of both decades were
much disparaged, although looking back I find them to be especially
fertile (albeit as extensions of the previous half-decade).
One side effect was noticing one of Capitol's 2002 "Crescent City
Soul" compilations that I had missed. I had to construct a playlist
to review it, but it was worth it. (Still, not as good as the
Minit-based Finger Poppin' and Stompin' Feet.) Tried to do
the same with David Toop's Sugar and Poison, but couldn't
find all the songs.
I also depleted enough of my promo queue that I inadvertently
reviewed records as far out as November 12. (I've been sitting on
the Fiedler and Balto albums for longer than I could stand.) Haven't
done anything yet with
the latest Phil Overeem list, but nice to see William Parker's
Painter's Winter high on the list (higher than Mayan Space
Station, which got first notice).
I finally bought a copy of a novel: Kim Stanley Robinson's The
Ministry for the Future, based on
Robert Christgau's review, although I had
previously linked to the
New Yorker essay Christgau cites. (Has it really been that far
back? First piece linked to there is titled, "As death toll passes 60,000,
Trump's team searches for an exit strategy." As you probably know, the
US death toll
passed 700,000 last week.) I quoted Robinson there:
Margaret Thatcher said that "there is no such thing as society," and
Ronald Reagan said that "government is not the solution to our problem;
government is the problem." These stupid slogans marked the turn away
from the postwar period of reconstruction and underpin much of the
bullshit of the past forty years. . . .
Economics is a system for optimizing resources, and, if it were
trying to calculate ways to optimize a sustainable civilization in
balance with the biosphere, it could be a helpful tool. When it's
used to optimize profit, however, it encourages us to live within
a system of destructive falsehoods.
I'm beginning to wonder whether the only forum for serious
discussions of viable solutions to ongoing crises isn't science
fiction. I've long wanted to collect my more harebrained ideas
under a recycling of Paul Goodman's 1962 title, Utopian Essays and
Practical Proposals, but it's getting hard to tell where one ends
and the other begins. Indeed, in the minds of certain "centrist" Dems
all variants are equally impossible, precisely because they are held
to be inconceivable.
I also ordered William T. Vollman's Carbon Strategies for
reference. I've thumbed through the two volumes at the library, and
can't imagine reading them through, but thought they might be useful
as references (although I have to wonder whether the deep discounts
at Amazon don't imply that they're already obsolete).
I've added a link at the bottom of every blog post to "Ask a question,
or send a comment." This links to my old
Ask a Question form, which I've hacked
a bit on. You can now choose "Question" or "Comment." The former gives me
input for my Questions & Answers
page. The latter sends me a comment without expectation of answer. I'm
not going to be a stickler on that point. There's also a new form field
for "URL Context." Eventually I'll figure out how to set this form from
the referer context, but I don't have that working yet. In the future,
I could add this link to many more pages, and could even develop some
kind of comment system. But for now, these changes haven't been given
much of a test. I appreciate your feedback, and would like to see more.
Thanks.
New records reviewed this week:
- Burnt Sugar/The Arkestra Chamber: Angels Over Oakanda (2018-21 [2021], Avantgroidd): [bc]: B+(***)
- Whit Dickey/William Parker/Matthew Shipp: Village Mothership (2020 [2021], Tao Forms): [cd]: A- [10-15]
- DMX Krew: Loose Gears (2021, Hypercolour): [r]: B+(***)
- Hernâni Faustino: Twelve Bass Tunes (2020 [2021], Phonogram Unit): [cd]: B+(***)
- Thomas Fehlmann: Böser Herbst (2021, Kompakt): [r]: A-
- Joe Fiedler's "Open Sesame": Fuzzy and Blue (2021, Multiphonics): [cd]: B+(***) [11-12]
- Kazemde George: I Insist (2019 [2021], Greenleaf Music): [cd]: B+(***) [10-22]
- Julia Govor: Winter Mute (2021, Jujuka, EP): [r]: B+(**)
- Eunhye Jeong: Nolda (2021, ESP-Disk): [cd]: B+(**) [09-24]
- Rochelle Jordan: Play With the Changes (2021, Young Art): [r]: B+(***)
- Kuzu: All Your Ghosts in One Corner (2020 [2021], Aerophonic): [cd]: B+(***) [10-05]
- José Lencastre Nau Quartet + Pedro Carneiro: Thoughts Are Things (2021, Phonogram Unit): [cd]: A-
- Bryan Murray & Jon Lundbom: Beats by Balto! Vol. 2 (2021, Chant): [cd]: B+(***) [11-07]
- Q'd Up: Going Places (2021, Tantara): [cd]: B [10-08]
- Rebellum: The Darknuss (2021, Avantgroidd): [bc]: B+(***)
- Matthew Stevens: Pittsburgh (2021, Whirlwind): [cd]: B
- Trondheim Jazz Orchestra & The MaXx: Live (2018 [2020], MNJ): [r]: B+(**)
- Trondheim Jazz Orchestra & Ole Morten Vågan: Plastic Wave (2020 [2021], Odin, 2CD): [bc]: A-
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries:
- Albert Ayler: New York Eye and Ear Control Revisited (1964 [2021], Ezz-Thetics): [bc]: B+(*)
- John Coltrane Quartet: Newport, New York, Alabama 1963 Revisited (1963 [2021], Ezz-Thetics): [bc]: B+(***)
- John Coltrane: Chasin' the Trane Revisited (1961 [2021], Ezz-Thetics): [bc]: A-
- Mike Taylor: Trio, Quartet & Composer Revisited (1965-68 [2021], Ezz-thetics): [bc]: B+(*)
Old music:
- Burnt Sugar/The Arkestra Chamber: Live From Minnegiggle Falls (2004 [2007], Avant Groidd): [bc]: B+(**)
- Burnt Sugar/The Arkestra Chamber: All Ya Needs That Negrocity (2008-11 [2011], Avant Groidd): [bc]: A-
- Thomas Fehlmann: 1929: Das Jahr Babylon (2018, Kompakt): [r]: B+(*)
- Grateful Dead: Dozin' at the Knick (1990 [1996], Grateful Dead, 3CD): [r]: B+(**)
- Grateful Dead: Crimson White & Indigo (1989 [2010], Grateful Dead/Rhino, 3CD): [r]: B
- The Guess Who: The Greatest of the Guess Who (1969-75 [1977], RCA Victor): [r]: B+(*)
- Jimi Hendrix Experience: Radio One (1967 [1988], Rykodisc): [r]: B+(***)
- Jimi Hendrix: Woodstock (1969 [1994], MCA): [r]: A-
- Jimi Hendrix: Hendrix in the West (1968-70 [2011], Experience Hendrix/Legacy): [r]: B+(***)
- Jimi Hendrix: Valleys of Neptune (1969-70 [2010], Experience Hendrix/Legacy): [r]: B+(**)
- Jimi Hendrix: Blue Wild Angel: Jimi Hendrix Live at the Isle of Wight (1970 [2002], Experience Hendrix/MCA, 2CD): [r]: B+(**)
- Jimi Hendrix: Voodoo Child: The Jimi Hendrix Collection (1967-70 [2001], Experience Hendrix/Universal, 2CD): [r]: A
- Jimi Hendrix: Fire: The Jimi Hendrix Collection (1967-70 [2010], Experience Hendrix/Legacy): [r]: A
- His Name Is Alive: Stars on E.S.P. (1996, 4AD): [r]: B+(*)
- The Hollies: In the Hollies Style (1964, Parlophone): [r]: B+(*)
- The Hollies: The Hollies' Greatest Hits (1965-72 [1973], Epic): [r]: B+(***)
- Hüsker Dü: Everything Falls Apart (1982 [1983], Reflex): [r]: B+(**)
- Irakere: Irakere (1978 [1979], Columbia): [r]: B+(***)
- Ronald Shannon Jackson: Pulse (1984, Celluloid): [r]: B+(*)
- Ronald Shannon Jackson and the Decoding Society: Decode Yourself (1984, Island): [r]: B+(*)
- Ronald Shannon Jackson: Red Warrior (1990, Axiom): [r]: B+(**)
- The Jacksons: The Jacksons (1976, Epic): [r]: B
- The Jacksons: Destiny (1978, Epic): [r]: B+(***)
- The Jacksons: Triumph (1980, Epic): [r]: B+(**)
- The Jacksons: Victory (1984, Epic): [r]: B+(***)
- Jaojoby: Aza Arianao (2001, Label Bleu): [r]: B+(**)
- Let the Good Times Roll: 20 of New Orleans' Finest R&B Classics 1946-1966 (1949-1966 [2002], Capitol): [r]: A-
- Shirley and Lee: Let the Good Times Roll (1952-59 [2000], Ace): [r]: B+(***)
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Hernâni Faustino: Twelve Bass Tunes (Phonogram Unit)
- Jü: III (RareNoise) * [09-24]
- José Lencastre Nau Quartet + Pedro Carneiro: Thoughts Are Things (Phonogram Unit)
- Jo Berger Myhre: Unheimlich Manoeuvre (RareNoise) * [09-24]
- Mareike Wiening: Future Memories (Greenleaf Music) [11-12]
Daily Log
Here's the Michaelanelo Matos 2021 EOY list (scraped from his FB
post, my grades in brackets):
- Rochelle Jordan, Play with the Changes [***]
- Julia Govor, Winter Mute [**]
- Madlib, Sound Ancestors [*]
- Mdou Moctar, Afrique Victime [A-]
- LSDXOXO, Dedicated 2 Disrespect [**]
- Burnt Sugar, Angels Over Oakanda [***]
- Thomas Fehlmann, Böser Herbst [A-]
- Sault, Untitled/9 [***]
- The Hold Steady, Open Door Policy [**]
- DMX Krew, Loose Gears [**]
Friday, October 01, 2021
Daily Log
Started a singles list here. On October 12, 2020, Moved it
somewhere else.
|
Sep 2021 |
|